RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772182
Increased Cesarean Section Rates during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Looking for Reasons through the Robson Ten Group Classification System
Aumento das taxas de cesárea durante a pandemia de COVID-19: procurando explicações por meio da Classificação de Robson
Abstract
Objective To compare cesarean section (CS) rates according to the Robson Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS) and its indications in pregnant women admitted for childbirth during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with those of the previous year.
Materials and Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study to compare women admitted for childbirth from April to October 2019 (before the pandemic) and from March to September 2020 (during the pandemic). The CSs and their indications were classified on admission according to the RTGCS, and we also collected data on the route of delivery (vaginal or CS). Both periods were compared using the Chi-squared (χ2) test or the Fisher exact test.
Results In total, 2,493 women were included, 1,291 in the prepandemic and 1,202 in the pandemic period. There was a a significant increase in the CS rate (from 39.66% to 44.01%; p = 0.028), mostly due to maternal request (from 9.58% to 25.38%; p < 0.01). Overall, groups 5 and 2 contributed the most to the CS rates. The rates decreased among group 1 and increased among group 2 during the pandemic, with no changes in group 10.
Conclusion There was an apparent change in the RTGSC comparing both periods, with a significant increase in CS rates, mainly by maternal request, most likely because of changes during the pandemic and uncertainties and fear concerning COVID-19.
Resumo
Objetivo Comparar as taxas de cesárea segundo a Classificação de Robson, assim como suas indicações, em mulheres admitidas para parto durante a primeira onda de doença do coronavírus 2019 (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19, em inglês), com as do ano anterior.
Materiais e Métodos Conduzimos um estudo transversal que comparou as mulheres admitidas para parto entre abril e outubro de 2019 (pré-pandemia) e entre março e setembro de 2020 (durante a pandemia). As cesarianas e as suas indicações foram classificadas conforme o sistema proposto por Robson, e obteve-se a via de parto (vaginal ou cesárea). Ambos os períodos foram comparados usando-se os testes do Qui quadrado ou o exato de Fisher.
Resultados Ao todo, 2.943 mulheres foram incluídas, das quais 1.291 antes da pandemia e 1.202 durante a pandemia. A taxa de cesárea aumentou significativamente (de 39.66% para 44,01%; p = 0,028), principalmente devido a desejo materno (de 9,58% para 25,38%; p < 0,01). Os grupos 5 e 2 foram os que mais contribuíram para as taxas de cesárea. Durante a pandemia, o grupo 1 reduziu sua frequência, enquanto o grupo 2 a aumentou.
Conclusão Houve uma aparente mudança nas características da população conforme a classificação de Robson. Observou-se significativo aumento nas taxas de cesárea, principalmente por desejo materno, o que reflete possíveis incertezas e medos relacionados à COVID-19.
Contributions
CEBS performed data collection, wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and reviewed its final version. JPSG had the original idea, performed the statistical analysis, and reviewed the final version of the manuscript. MLC also had the original idea, coordinated the group, and reviewed the final version of the manuscript.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 16. Dezember 2022
Angenommen: 11. April 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. August 2023
© 2023. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 World Health Organization. Director-General's Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19—March 11 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020 (accessed on September 29, 2021).
- 2 Karimi L, Makvandi S, Vahedian-Azimi A, Sathyapalan T, Sahebkar A. Effect of COVID-19 on Mortality of Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pregnancy 2021; 2021: 8870129
- 3 Neiva MB, Carvalho I, Costa Filho EDS, Barbosa-Junior F, Bernardi FA, Sanches TLM. et al. Brazil: the emerging epicenter of COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2020; 53: e20200550
- 4 Mappa I, Distefano FA, Rizzo G. Effects of coronavirus 19 pandemic on maternal anxiety during pregnancy: a prospectic observational study. J Perinat Med 2020; 48 (06) 545-550
- 5 Davis-Floyd R, Gutschow K, Schwartz DA. Pregnancy, Birth and the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States. Med Anthropol 2020; 39 (05) 413-427
- 6 CDC. Care for newborns. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/caring-for-newborns.html (acessed on November 15, 2020
- 7 Salehi L, Rahimzadeh M, Molaei E, Zaheri H, Esmaelzadeh-Saeieh S. The relationship among fear and anxiety of COVID-19, pregnancy experience, and mental health disorder in pregnant women: A structural equation model. Brain Behav 2020; 10 (11) e01835
- 8 World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985; 2 (8452) 436-437
- 9 Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG 2016; 123 (05) 667-670
- 10 Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev 2001; 12 (01) 23-39
- 11 Nakamura-Pereira M, do Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Domingues RMSM, Torres JA, Dias MAB, Moreira ME. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health 2016; 13 (Suppl. 03) 128
- 12 http://svs.aids.gov.br/dantps/centrais-de-conteudos/paineis-de-monitoramento/natalidade/grupos-de-robson/ (acessed on October 4, 2021
- 13 Knobel R, Lopes TJP, Menezes MO, Andreucci CB, Gieburowski JT, Takemoto MLS. Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2020; 42 (09) 522-528
- 14 Domingues RM, Dias MA, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, d'Orsi E, Pereira APE. et al. Process of decision-making regarding the mode of birth in Brazil: from the initial preference of women to the final mode of birth. Cad Saude Publica 2014; 30 (Suppl. 01) S1-S16
- 15 Rudey EL, Leal MDC, Rego G. Defensive medicine and cesarean sections in Brazil. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100 (01) e24176
- 16 Sun SY, Guazzelli CAF, de Morais LR, Dittmer FP, Augusto MN, Soares AC. et al. Effect of delayed obstetric labor care during the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 151 (02) 287-289
- 17 Khalil A, von Dadelszen P, Draycott T, Ugwumadu A, O'Brien P, Magee L. Change in the Incidence of Stillbirth and Preterm Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA 2020; 324 (07) 705-706
- 18 World Health Organization. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996