RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761265
Imaging Recommendations for Image-Guided Biopsy in Oncology

Abstract
The percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) is the initial step for obtaining the diagnosis and it helps in treatment. It aids in primary diagnosis, tumor staging, or ruling out infective etiology. It is a safe and successful minimally invasive method compared to open biopsies. PNB is defined as the placement and insertion of a needle into a suspected lesion or organ with the intent of retrieving tissue or cells for diagnosis. It can fine needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy. The patient needs to be counseled regarding the procedure and detailed history, including anticoagulant history needs to be taken. The SIR consensus guidelines have divided biopsies into low-risk procedures with a bleeding risk of < 1.5% and high-risk procedures > 1.5%. There are advancements in needle design (e.g., echogenic tip while performing ultrasound-guided needle biopsy) and image-guidance technology (ultrasound quality, multi-slice CT scan) that improved these procedures safety and efficacy. There are different types of needles available such as coaxial, aspiration needles, Murphy's bone biopsy needle, which depends on the tissue which needs to be sampled or the organ to be biopsied. Various different types of biopsy guns, such as semi-automatic, automatic, or manual are available. The newer technology such as fusion and navigation biopsies helps in better characterizing and localization of the lesion, improving the yield of the biopsy. Open and excisional biopsies have a higher mortality and morbidity rate than percutaneous biopsies, they are reserved for cases where the image-guided method has failed to provide the diagnostic yield. Sample collection must be done under a sterile container in formaline or microbiological examination. Regular analysis and rad-path correlation are key to success and improving diagnostic yield. This abstract provides an overview of the existing biopsy literature.
Keywords
diagnostic accuracy - complication - core-needle biopsy (CNB) - oncologic imaging - percutaneous biopsyNote
The article is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Each author participated sufficiently for the work to be submitted. Publication is approved by all authors.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. Mai 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Gupta S, Madoff DC. Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cancer diagnosis and staging. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 10 (02) 88-101
- 2 Cardella JF, Bakal CW, Bertino RE. et al; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for image-guided percutaneous biopsy in adults. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (9 Pt 2): S227-S230
- 3 Schiavon LHO, Tyng CJ, Travesso DJ, Rocha RD, Schiavon ACSA, Bitencourt AGV. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of abdominal lesions: indications, techniques, results, and complications. Radiol Bras 2018; 51 (03) 141-146
- 4 Veltri A, Bargellini I, Giorgi L, Almeida PA, Akhan O. CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB). Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 2017; 40 (10) 1501-1513
- 5 Gutierrez A, Abtin F, Suh RD. Percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy. In percutaneous image-guided biopsy. New York, NY: Springer; 2014. :141–166
- 6 Gupta S, Seaberg K, Wallace MJ. et al. Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal lesions: different approaches and anatomic considerations. Radiographics 2005; 25 (03) 763-786 , discussion 786–788
- 7 Shankar S, van Sonnenberg E, Silverman SG, Tuncali K. Interventional radiology procedures in the liver. Biopsy, drainage, and ablation. Clin Liver Dis 2002; 6 (01) 91-118
- 8 Heyer CM, Al-Hadari A, Mueller KM, Stachon A, Nicolas V. Effectiveness of CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of the spine: an analysis of 202 examinations. Acad Radiol 2008; 15 (07) 901-911
- 9 Wu EH, Chen YL, Wu YM, Huang YT, Wong HF, Ng SH. CT-guided core needle biopsy of deep suprahyoid head and neck lesions. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14 (02) 299-306
- 10 Tam AL, Lim HJ, Wistuba II. et al. Image-guided biopsy in the era of personalized cancer care: proceedings from the society of interventional radiology research consensus panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (01) 8-19
- 11 Lorentzen T, Nolsøe CP, Ewertsen C. et al; EFSUMB. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), part I–general aspects (long version). Ultraschall Med 2015; 36 (05) E1-E14
- 12 Sato S, Mishiro T, Miyake T. et al. Prophylactic administration of antibiotics unnecessary following ultrasound-guided biopsy and ablation therapy for liver tumors: open-labeled randomized prospective study. Hepatol Res 2009; 39 (01) 40-46
- 13 Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus Guidelines for the Periprocedural Management of Thrombotic and Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Image-Guided Interventions-part II: recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (08) 1168-1184.e1
- 14 Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC. Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (07) 969-975
- 15 Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JA. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: preprocedural evaluation and technique. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (05) W511-4
- 16 Tyng CJ, Bitencourt AG, Martins EB, Pinto PN, Chojniak R. Technical note: CT-guided paravertebral adrenal biopsy using hydrodissection–a safe and technically easy approach. Br J Radiol 2012; 85 (1015): e339-e342
- 17 Grasso RF, Faiella E, Luppi G. et al. Percutaneous lung biopsy: comparison between an augmented reality CT navigation system and standard CT-guided technique. Int J CARS 2013; 8 (05) 837-848
- 18 Rosati A, Gueli Alletti S, Capozzi VA. et al. Role of ultrasound in the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer: a review of the literature. Gland Surg 2020; 9 (04) 1092-1101
- 19 Sodickson A, Weiss M. Effects of patient size on radiation dose reduction and image quality in low-kVp CT pulmonary angiography performed with reduced IV contrast dose. Emerg Radiol 2012; 19 (05) 437-445
- 20 Du J, Huang Z, Luo Q. et al. Rapid diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis by Xpert MTB/RIF assay using pleural biopsy and pleural fluid specimens. J Res Med Sci 2015; 20 (01) 26-31
- 21 Atwell TD, Smith RL, Hesley GK. et al. Incidence of bleeding after 15,181 percutaneous biopsies and the role of aspirin. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (03) 784-789
- 22 Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU. et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2013; 64 (06) 876-892
- 23 Lang EK, Ghavami R, Schreiner VC, Archibald S, Ramirez J. Autologous blood clot seal to prevent pneumothorax at CT-guided lung biopsy. Radiology 2000; 216 (01) 93-96
- 24 Burke DR. Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 243-246
- 25 Adiga S, Athreya S. Safety, efficacy, and feasibility of an ultra-low dose radiation protocol for CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of pulmonary lesions: initial experience. Clin Radiol 2014; 69 (07) 709-714