The Need for Multidisciplinary Research within the History and Theory of Homeopathy^[*]

Abstract

The controversial issue of homeopathy's scientificity will, in all probability, not be settled by means of clinical trials alone, as long as uncertainty or ignorance about methodological, philosophical, and socio-economical essentials prevail on both sides of the argument. Rather than uncritically adopt the standards of the currently predominant paradigm, homeopathy should not forget its roots, peculiarities, and self-conception. Contrary to conventional medicine, it is based on a teleological image of humanity, a holistic and sustainable approach towards curing sickness, and an up-to-date concept of medical theory in terms of healing arts. However, under today's frameworked conditions of industrialisation, commercialisation and commodification, the strengths of homeopathy tend to be disregarded or even attacked, and a special kind of reductionist and materialist rationality, compatible with expanding markets and profits, is preferably facilitated. To reveal and demonstrate these developments and relationships on a scientific level, there is a need for multidisciplinary research on the part of the humanities, such as history and theory of medicine, history and theory of science, history of economics, sociology of scientific knowledge, and philosophy.

Keywords

history of medicine - theory of medicine - homeopathy - history of science - theory of science

Highlights

• To assess the scientific status of homeopathy, not only natural sciences and clinical trials, but also methodological, philosophical and socio-economical considerations are required.

• Although ostensibly forced to comply with the standards of evidence-based medicine, homeopathy should never forget its roots, peculiarity, and self-conception.

• Homeopathy is based on a teleological image of humanity, a holistic and sustainable approach towards healing diseases, and an up-to-date concept of medical theory in terms of healing arts.

• Today's socioeconomic and intellectual framework conditions are prone to disregard the strengths of homeopathy and rather facilitate a reductionist and materialist rationality, compatible with expanding markets and profits.

• To reveal and demonstrate these cultural and political developments and relationships on a scientific level, multidisciplinary research together with the humanities, including historical, social, economical and philosophical sciences, is needed.

^* This article is a revised version of a paper presented at the 70th Congress of the Liga Medicorum Homoeopathica Internationalis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on August 26, 2015.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 02. März 2020

Angenommen: 12. Mai 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. September 2020

• References

• 1 Dean ME. The Trials of Homeopathy. Origins, Structure and Development. Essen: KVC-Verlag; 2004
• 2 Hahn RG. Homeopathy: meta-analyses of pooled clinical data. Forsch Komplementmed 2013; 20: 376-381
• 3 Mathie RT, Lloyd SM, Legg LA. et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 142
• 4 Mathie RT, Ramparsad N, Legg LA. et al. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2017; 6: 63
• 5 Mathie RT, Fok YYY, Viksveen P, To AKL, Davidson JRT. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, other-than-placebo controlled, trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment. Homeopathy 2019; 108: 88-101
• 6 Gorski DH, Novella SP. Clinical trials of integrative medicine: testing whether magic works?. Trends Mol Med 2014; 20: 473-476
• 7 Huisman F, Warner JH. eds. Locating Medical History. The Stories and Their Meaning. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2006
• 8 Coulter HL. The Controlled Clinical Trial. An Analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Empirical Medicine; 1991
• 9 Schmidt JM. Taschenatlas Homöopathie in Wort und Bild. Grundlagen, Methodik und Geschichte. Heidelberg: Haug; 2001: 120-123
• 10 Spaemann R, Löw R. Die Frage Wozu? Geschichte und Wiederentdeckung des teleologischen Denkens. München, Zürich: Piper; 1985
• 11 Jaeger W. ed. Aristotelis Metaphysica. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1980: 983a
• 12 Platon. Phaidros. In: Burnet I. ed. Platonis Opera. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979: 268-270
• 13 Platon. Gorgias. In: Burnet I. ed. Platonis Opera. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979: 454
• 14 Bywater I. ed. Ethica Nicomachea—Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979: 1097a , 1104a, 1137a, 1145a
• 15 Wieland W. Diagnose. Überlegungen zur Medizintheorie. 2nd ed. Berlin: Hoof; 2015
• 16 Wiesing U. Wer heilt, hat Recht? Über Pragmatik und Pluralität in der Medizin. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2004
• 17 Hahnemann S. Organon der Heilkunde [1942]. In: Schmidt JM, ed. Neufassung mit Systematik und Glossar. München: Elsevier; 2003
• 18 Hahnemann S. In: Brewster O'Reilly W, ed. Organon of the Medical Art. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers; 2010
• 19 Hamilton P. Knowledge and Social Structure: An Introduction to the Classical Argument in the Sociology of Knowledge. London, Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1974
• 20 Latour B, Woolgar S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1986
• 21 Shapin S. Here and everywhere: sociology of scientific knowledge. Annu Rev Sociol 1995; 21: 289-321
• 22 Brown P. Perspectives in Medical Sociology. 4th ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press; 2008
• 23 Seaford R. Money and the Early Greek Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004
• 24 Graeber D. Debt. The First 5,000 Years. New York: Melville House; 2011
• 25 Brodbeck KH. Die Herrschaft des Geldes. Geschichte und Systematik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft; 2009
• 26 Sharp LA. The commodification of the body and its parts. Annu Rev Anthropol 2000; 29: 287-328
• 27 Shapin S. The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996
• 28 Porter R. The Greatest Benefit to Mankind. A Medical History of Humanity from Antiquity to the Present. London: HarperCollins; 1997
• 29 Bynum WF, Hardy A, Jacyna S. , Lawrence C, Tansey EM. The Western Medical Tradition 1800 to 2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006
• 30 Schmidt JM. Believing in order to understand: Hahnemann's hierarchisation of values. Homeopathy 2008; 97: 156-160
• 31 Anonymous. Harry Gold, a heart specialist and digitalis pioneer, is dead. The New York Times; 1972. (April 22): 36
• 32 Kaptchuk TJ. Powerful placebo: the dark side of the randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1998; 351: 1722-1725
• 33 Kaptchuk TJ. Intentional ignorance: a history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine. Bull Hist Med 1998; 72: 389-433
• 34 Kiene H. Komplementäre Methodenlehre der klinischen Forschung. Cognition-based Medicine. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2001: 166-167
• 35 Wolff HG, Dubois EF, Gold H. et al. Conferences on therapy: the use of placebos in therapy. N Y State J Med 1946; 46: 1718-1727
• 36 Gold H, Grace WJ, Ferguson FC. et al. Conference on therapy: how to evaluate a new drug. Am J Med 1954; 17: 722-727
• 37 Beecher HK. The powerful placebo. J Am Med Assoc 1955; 159: 1602-1606
• 38 Quigley C. Tragedy and Hope. A History of the World in Our Time. New York, London: Macmillan; 1966
• 39 Fleck L. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv [1935]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1980
• 40 Fleck L. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979
• 41 Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962
• 42 Feyerabend P. Against Method. Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books; 1975
• 43 Kohler RE. From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry: The Making of a Biomedical Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982: 6
• 44 Schmidt JM. Die Entstehung, Verbreitung und Entwicklung von Heilsystemen als Gegenstand der Medizingeschichte—am Beispiel der Homöopathie. Sudhoffs Arch 2007; 91: 38-72
• 45 Schmidt JM. New approaches within the history and theory of medicine and their relevance for homeopathy. Homeopathy 2014; 103: 153-159
• 46 Schmidt JM. Polyperspektivität in der Medizin: Dilemma oder Chance? Zur Ganzheitlichkeit der Homöopathie Hahnemanns. Schweiz Z Ganzheitsmed 2017; 29: 376-384
• 47 Kant I. Kritik der Urteilskraft [1790]. In: Weischedel W. ed. Immanuel Kant. Werke. Vol. 10. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1974: 69-456
• 48 Löw R. Philosophie des Lebendigen. Der Begriff des Organischen bei Kant, sein Grund und seine Aktualität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1980
• 49 Vaihinger H. Die Philosophie des Als Ob. System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus [1911]. 4th ed. Leipzig: Meiner; 1920
• 50 Vaihinger H. The Philosophy of “As If”. A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind [1924]. London: Routledge; 2002
• 51 Schmidt JM. Is homeopathy a science?—Continuity and clash of concepts of science within holistic medicine. J Med Humanit 2009; 30: 83-97
• 52 Seaford R. The Origins of Philosophy in Ancient Greece and Ancient India. A Historical Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020
• 53 Susemihl F. ed. Aristoteles Politik: Griechisch und Deutsch. Leipzig: Engelmann; 1879
• 54 Hahnemann S. Gesammelte kleine Schriften. In: Schmidt JM, Kaiser D, eds. Heidelberg: Haug; 2001
• 55 Jütte R. Samuel Hahnemann. Begründer der Homöopathie. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag; 2005
• 56 Chalmers AF. What is This Thing Called Science? 3rd ed. St. Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press; 1999
• 57 Moore GE. Principia Ethica [1903]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1954
• 58 Capra F, Luisi PL. The Systems View of Life. A Unifying Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014
• 59 Milgrom LR. Entelechy regained? Further musings on a quantised gyroscopic metaphor for the vital force in health and disease. Complement Med Res 2020; 27: 6-18
• 60 Hankey A. A new approach to biology and medicine: an expanded role for regulation. J Sci Healing Outcomes 2015; 7 (27) 13-18
• 61 Hankey A. Self-organized criticality supports naturopathy and self-healing. J Sci Healing Outcomes 2019; 11 (42) 5-9
• 62 Pincus D, Walach H. eds. Complexity, Whole Systems Research, and Complementary Therapies. New Concepts and Methods. Forsch Komplementmed, Suppl. 1. Freiburg: Karger; 2012