A Comparative Study of the Length Patterns of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions in the Dog and Man

M. P. Palmisano; J. T. Andrish; M. L. Olmstead; Helen Kambic; A. Shah

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1632634

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13(02): 73-77
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632634

Original Reearch

Schattauer GmbH

A Comparative Study of the Length Patterns of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions in the Dog and Man

M. P. Palmisano

¹Ohio State Univerisity Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, USA

,

J. T. Andrish

¹Ohio State Univerisity Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, USA

²Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopedics, Department of Biostatistics, USA

,

M. L. Olmstead

¹Ohio State Univerisity Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, USA

³Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biostatistics, USA

,

Helen Kambic

¹Ohio State Univerisity Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, USA

³Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biostatistics, USA

,

A. Shah

¹Ohio State Univerisity Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, USA

⁴Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Biostatistics, USA

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objective

To measure the change of length patterns of nine different simulated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in the canine and human knee.

Procedures

Six fresh-frozen canine cadaver knees and six fresh-frozen human cadaver knees were used in this study. All of the soft tissues were removed from each cadaver knee, leaving the menisci, collateral ligaments and cruciate ligaments intact. After fixation of the femur to a custom-made frame, the ACL was excised. Three tunnels were made each at the ACL origin and insertion, making possible nine reconstruction combinations. A modified intra-articular technique was used to measure change of length, in mm, of each ACL reconstruction through a range of motion of 0 degrees (full extension) to 135 degrees of flexion. A rankorder list of reconstruction combinations was determined. The most isometric combination was determined for the canine and human knees, and trends in length patterns were also evaluated in both species relative to femoral and tibial position. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA.

Results

A combination joining a point caudal to the ACL origin (over-the-top) and anterior on the tibial insertion was found to be the most isometric combination in both the canine and human. The trends in change of length patterns across all reconstruction combinations were similar in the dog and man. Isometry was improved as the reconstruction was placed further posterior on the femur and anterior on the tibia. Conclusions: The canine knee is an appropriate animal model for the study of isometry of the human ACL and its reconstructions.

The length patterns of nine simulated Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstructions were determined in the dog and man. In both species, the most isometric reconstruction was one joining points corresponding to a position at the posterior edge of the intercondylar roof of the femur (over-thetop) with a position anterior on the ACL insertion. For the sake of clarity the term anterior cruciate ligament has been used, throughout, for both species, instead of the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) in the dog. Also knee has been used in place of stifle for the dog.

Keywords

ACL - isometry - canine - human - biomechanics

Full Text

References

REFERENCES
1 Arnoczky SP, Marshall JL. The cruciate ligament of the canine stifle: an anatomical and functional analysis. Am J Yet Res 1977; 38: 1807-14.
2 Beynnon BD, Howe JG, Pope MH. et al. The measurement of anterior cruciate ligament train in vivo. International Orthopaedic 1992; 16: 1-12.
3 Beynnon BD, Fleming BC, Renstrom PA. et al. The measurement of elongation of anterior cruciate ligament graft in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76-A: 521-31.
4 Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Renstrom PA. et al. The elongation behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament graft in vivo: a long-term follow-up Study. 44^th annual meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society. 1998, New Orileans, Louisiana.
5 Clancy WG, Nelson DA, Reider B. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using one-third of the patellar ligament, augmented by extra-articular tendon transfer. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64-A: 352-9.
6 Clancy WG, Shelbourne KD, Zoellner GB. et al. Treatment of knee joint tability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65-A: 310-22.
7 Dorlot JM, Christel P, Meunier A. et al. The displacement of the bony insertion sites of the anterior cruciate ligament during the flexion of the knee. 29^th annual meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society. 1983, Anaheiem, California.
8 Galway RD, Beaupre A, Maclntosh DL. Pivot shift: A clinical sign of symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. J Bone Joint Surg 1972; 63-A: 763-4.
9 Girgi F, Marshall JL, Al Monahern AR. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint: anatomical, functional, and experirmental analysis. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1975; 106: 216-31.
10 Hefzy MS, Grood ES. Sensitivity of insertion location on length pattern of anterior cruciate ligaments fibre. J Biornec Engin 1986; 108: 73-82.
11 Hefzy M, Grood ES. Factor affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachment. Part II: The anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 1998; 17: 208-15.
12 Hoogland T, Hillen B. Intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: an experimental Study of length change in different ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1984; 185: 197-201.
13 Howell SM, Clark JA, Farley TE. A rationale for predicting anterior cruciate graft impingement by the intercondylar roof: A magnetic resonance imaging Study. Am J Sport Med 1991; 19: 276-82.
14 Insall J, Joseph DM, Aglietti B. et al. Boneblock iliotibial-band transfer for anterior cruciate insufficiency. J Bone Joint Surg 1981; 63-A: 560-9.
15 Khalfayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH. et al. The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 335-41.
16 Norwood LA, Cross MJ. Anterior cruciate ligament: Functional anatomy and its bundles inrotatory instabilities. Am J Sport Med 1979; 07: 23-6.
17 O’Donoghsue DH. A method for replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Report of twenty case. J Bone Joint Surg 1963; 45-A: 905-24.
18 Rougraff B, Shelbourne KD. Arthroscopic and hitologic analysis of human patellar tendon autograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sport Med 1993; 21: 277-84.
19 Sapega AA, Moyer RA, Schenck C. et al. Testing for isometric during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: Anatomical and biological consideration. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72-A: 259-67.
20 Selvik G. Roentgen stereogrammetric analysis. Acta Radiologica 1990; 31: 113-26.
21 Shelbourne KD, Klootwyk TE, Wilken JH. et al. Ligament stability two to six year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft and participation in accelerated rehabilitation program. Am J Sport Med 1995; 23: 575-8.
22 Sidles JA, Larson RV, Garkine JL. et al. Ligament length relationship in the moving knee. J Orthop Res 1988; 06: 593-610.
23 Tohyarna H, Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ. et al. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft elongation at the time of implantation on the biomechanical behavior of the graft and knee. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 608-14.
24 Wang CJ, Walker PS. The effect of flexion and rotation on the length pattern of the ligament of the knee. J Biomec 1973; 06: 587-96.
25 Xerogeane JW, Fox RJ, Takeda Y. et al. A functional comparison of animal anterior cruciate ligament models to the human anterior cruciate ligament. Ann Biomed Engineering 1998; 26: 342-52.