Die Wissenschaft vom Flirten

• Literatur

• 1 Abler B, Herrnberger B, Grön G, Spitzer M. From uncertainty to reward: BOLD characteristics differentiate signaling pathways. BMC Neuroscience 2009; 10: 154-165.
• 2 Back MD, Penke L, Schmukle SC, Asendorpf JB. Knowing your own mate value: sex-specific personality effects on the accuracy of expected mate choices. Psychological Science 2011; 22: 984-989.
• 3 Bale C, Morrison R, Caryl PG. Chat-up lines as male sexual displays. Personalityand Individual Differences 2006; 40: 655-664.
• 4 Bartels A. Die Liebe im Kopf. In: Spitzer M, Bertram W. (Hrsg.). Hirnforschung für Neu(ro)gierige. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2010
• 5 Bressler ER, Balshine S. The influence of humor on desirability. Evolution and Human Behavior 2006; 27: 29-39.
• 6 Buss DM. Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionaty hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1989; 12: 1-49.
• 7 Buss DM. The evolution of desire. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1994
• 8 Buss DM. Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1999
• 9 Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 1993; 100: 204-232.
• 10 Cooper M, O’Donnell D, Caryl PG, Morrison R, Bale C. Chat-up lines as male displays: Effects of content, sex, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences 2007; 43: 1075-1085.
• 11 Darwin C. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray; 1871
• 12 Finkel EJ, Eastwick PW. Arbitrary social norms influence sex differences in romantic selectivity. Psychological Science 2009; 20: 1290-1295.
• 13 Gangestad SW, Garver-Apgar CE, Simpson JA, Cousins AJ. Changes in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007; 92: 151-163.
• 14 Geary DC, Vigil J, Bryd-Craven J. Evolution of human mate choice. The Journal of Sex Research 2004; 41: 27-42.
• 15 Grammer K, Honda M, Juette A, Schmitt A. Fuzziness of non-verbal courtship communication unblurred by motion energy detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999; 77: 487-508.
• 16 Gray J. Men are from mars, women are from venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships [Dt.: Männer sind anders, Frauen auch]. London, UK: Harpercollins; 1998
• 17 Hall JA, Carter S, Cody MJ, Albright JM. Individual differences in the communication of romantic interest: Development oft he Flirting Styles Inventory. Communication Quarterly 2010; 58: 365-393.
• 18 Haselton M, Miller GF. Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence compared to wealth. Human Nature 2006; 17: 50-73.
• 19 Hill SE, Buss DM. The mere presence of oppositesex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: opposite effects form en and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008; 34: 635-647.
• 20 Ireland ME, Slatcher RB, Eastwick PW, Scissors LE, Finkel EJ, Pennebaker JW. Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science 2011; 22: 39-44.
• 21 Lee L, Loewenstein G, Ariely D, Hong J, Young J. If I’m not hot, are you hot or not? Physical-attractiveness evaluations and dating preferences as a function of one’s own attractiveness. Psychological Science 2008; 19: 669-677.
• 22 Lenton AP, Francesconi M. How humans cognitively manage an abundance of mate options. Psychological Science 2010; 21: 528-533.
• 23 Nettle D, Clegg H. Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2006; 273: 611-615.
• 24 Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Burt DM. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 1999; 399: 741-741.
• 25 Place SS, Todd PM, Penke L. Asendorpf The ability to judge the romantic interest of others. Psychological Science 2009; 20: 22-26.
• 26 Prokosch MD, Coss RG, Scheib JE, Blozis SA. Intelligence and mate choice: intelligent men are always appealing. Evolution and Human Behavior 2009; 30: 11-20.
• 27 Spitzer M. Verlobungsringe, Parasiten und Gehirne. Nervenheilkunde 2000; 19: 415-417.
• 28 Todd PM, Penke L, Fasolo B, Lenton AP. Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. PNAS 2007; 104: 15011-15016.
• 29 Trivers R. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B. (eds.) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971, S. 136–179. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1972
• 30 Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ. Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: “The Sexy Son Hypothesis”. The American Naturalist 1979; 113: 201-208.
• 31 Weinmann J, Rübenach S. Paare in Deutschland: Gleich und gleich gesellt sich gern. STAT Magazin, Statistisches Bundesamt. 2010
• 32 Whitchurch ER, Wilson TD, Gilbert DT. “He loves me, he loves me not...”: uncertainty can increase romantic attraction. Psychological Science 2011; 22: 172-175.
• 33 Wilder G. Die Frau in Rot (Woman in Red). USA; 1984
• 34 Goofredson LS, Deary IJ. Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why?. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2004; 13: 901-8.
• 35 Kayser DN, Elliott AJ, Feltman R. Red and romantic behavior in men viewing women. Eur J Social Psychol 2010; 40: 901-8.
• 36 Jacobs GH. The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol Rev 1993; 68: 413-71.
• 37 Waitt C. et al. Evidence from rhesus macaques suggests that male coloration plays a role in female primate mate choice. Proceedings oft he Royal Society London B 2003; 270: 144-6.
• 38 Elliot AJ. et al. Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men. J Experimental Psychol: General 2010; 139: 399-417.