RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000072.xml
PDF herunterladen
Semin Reprod Med 2017; 35(04): 364-377
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602594
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602594
Review Article
Robotics and Reproductive Surgery
Weitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
16. Oktober 2017 (online)
Abstract
Robotic technology applied to laparoscopy augments the armamentarium of the reproductive specialist. Uterine leiomyomas, adenomyosis, endometriosis, adnexal masses, sterilization reversal, and fertility preservation techniques can all be addressed with a robotic surgery skill set. Additionally, new approaches with single site and natural orifice surgery will continue to maximize advanced opportunities for safe, effective, and cosmetically conscious (patient-centered) approaches to surgical care. Enhanced postoperative recovery pathways are fully adaptable to these robotic procedures and improve patient acceptability while controlling costs.
-
References
- 1 AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20 (01) 2-9
- 2 http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Patient-Safety-and-Quality-Improvement/Choosing-Wisely . Accessed January 23, 2017
- 3 Ficko Z, Koo K, Hyams ES. High tech or high risk? An analysis of media reports about robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 2016; 1-6 . PMID: 27778227 [Epub ahead of print]
- 4 Irani M, Prabakar C, Nematian S, Julka N, Bhatt D, Bral P. Patient perceptions of open, laparoscopic, and robotic gynecological surgeries. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016: 4284093
- 5 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015; 103 (03) e18-e25
- 6 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015; 103 (06) e44-e50
- 7 Campbell BT, Austin DM, Kahn O. , et al. Current trends in the surgical treatment of pediatric ovarian torsion: we can do better. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (08) 1374-1377
- 8 Gargiulo AR. Computer-assisted reproductive surgery: why it matters to reproductive endocrinology and infertility subspecialists. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (04) 911-921
- 9 Munro MG. The surgical “robot” in benign gynecology: surgical advance or a set of costly training wheels?. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23 (01) 1-4
- 10 Catenacci M, Flyckt RL, Falcone T. Robotics in reproductive surgery: strengths and limitations. Placenta 2011; 32 (Suppl. 03) S232-S237
- 11 Truong M, Kim JH, Scheib S, Patzkowsky K. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 28 (04) 304-310
- 12 Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (01) 100-107
- 13 Buttram Jr VC, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil Steril 1981; 36 (04) 433-445
- 14 Parker WH. Etiology, symptomatology, and diagnosis of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril 2007; 87 (04) 725-736
- 15 Falcone T, Parker WH. Surgical management of leiomyomas for fertility or uterine preservation. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (04) 856-868
- 16 Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (04) 1215-1223
- 17 Somigliana E, De Benedictis S, Vercellini P. , et al. Fibroids not encroaching the endometrial cavity and IVF success rate: a prospective study. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (04) 834-839
- 18 Eldar-Geva T, Meagher S, Healy DL, MacLachlan V, Breheny S, Wood C. Effect of intramural, subserosal, and submucosal uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril 1998; 70 (04) 687-691
- 19 Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (02) 418-429
- 20 Yan L, Ding L, Li C, Wang Y, Tang R, Chen ZJ. Effect of fibroids not distorting the endometrial cavity on the outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2014; 101 (03) 716-721
- 21 Munro MG, Critchley HO, Fraser IS. ; FIGO Menstrual Disorders Working Group. The FIGO classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (07) 2204-2208 , 2208.e1–2208.e3
- 22 Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F. , et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 (12) 2663-2668
- 23 Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Vianello F. , et al. Obstetric and delivery outcome of pregnancies achieved after laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril 2006; 86 (01) 159-165
- 24 Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174 (02) 654-658
- 25 Holzer A, Jirecek ST, Illievich UM, Huber J, Wenzl RJ. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: a double-blind study to evaluate postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 2006; 102 (05) 1480-1484
- 26 Luciano AA. Myomectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 52 (03) 362-371
- 27 Dubuisson JB, Fauconnier A, Deffarges JV, Norgaard C, Kreiker G, Chapron C. Pregnancy outcome and deliveries following laparoscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 (04) 869-873
- 28 Falcone T, Bedaiwy MA. Minimally invasive management of uterine fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14 (04) 401-407
- 29 Cicinelli E, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G, Saliani N. Laparoscopy vs minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: a prospective randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16 (04) 422-426
- 30 Lewis EI, Gargiulo AR. The role of hysteroscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy in the setting of infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 59 (01) 53-65
- 31 Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J. , et al. , eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/ [based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site; April 2014. Accessed July 26, 2017]
- 32 Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, Reynolds RK. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004; 11 (04) 511-518
- 33 Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (2, Pt 1): 256-265
- 34 Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau IV S, Ransom SB. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14 (06) 698-705
- 35 Griffin L, Feinglass J, Garrett A. , et al. Postoperative outcomes after robotic versus abdominal myomectomy. JSLS 2013; 17 (03) 407-413
- 36 Bedient CE, Magrina JF, Noble BN, Kho RM. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (06) 566.e1-566.e5
- 37 Gargiulo AR, Srouji SS, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Vellinga TT, Einarsson JI. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (2, Pt 1): 284-291
- 38 Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy--a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (02) 556-559
- 39 Pitter MC, Gargiulo AR, Bonaventura LM, Lehman JS, Srouji SS. Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (01) 99-108
- 40 Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (09) 1959-1966
- 41 Liu L, Li Y, Xu H, Chen Y, Zhang G, Liang Z. Laparoscopic transient uterine artery occlusion and myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myoma. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (01) 254-258
- 42 Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Iuzzolino D, Surico D, Reich H. Laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: short-term and fertility results. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (07) 2368-2373
- 43 Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A. , et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 2007; 88 (04) 933-941
- 44 Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Malzoni M. , et al. Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14 (04) 453-462
- 45 Lönnerfors C, Persson J. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy; a feasible technique for removal of unfavorably localized myomas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88 (09) 994-999
- 46 Goodman LR, Goldberg JM, Flyckt RL, Gupta M, Harwalker J, Falcone T. Effect of surgery on ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas, endometriosis and controls. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (05) 589.e1-589.e6
- 47 El Khouly NI, Barr RL, Kim BB. , et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy in the management of adnexal masses. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21 (06) 1071-1074
- 48 Eichelberger KY, Cantrell LA, Balthazar U, Boggess KA, Strauss RA, Boggess JF. Robotic resection of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30 (05) 371-375
- 49 Scheib SA, Fader AN. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (02) 179.e1-179.e8
- 50 Gungor M, Kahraman K, Ozbasli E, Genim C. Ovarian cystectomy for a dermoid cyst with the new single-port robotic system. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2015; 24 (02) 123-126
- 51 Schleedoorn MJ, Nelen WL, Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Group E. ; EndoKey Group. Selection of key recommendations for the management of women with endometriosis by an international panel of patients and professionals. Hum Reprod 2016; 31 (06) 1208-1218
- 52 Collinet P, Leguevaque P, Neme RM. , et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis: international multicentric retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2014; 28 (08) 2474-2479
- 53 Nezhat C, Lewis M, Kotikela S. , et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (07) 2758-2760
- 54 Brudie LA, Gaia G, Ahmad S. , et al. Peri-operative outcomes of patients with stage IV endometriosis undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Robot Surg 2012; 6 (04) 317-322
- 55 Nezhat CR, Stevens A, Balassiano E, Soliemannjad R. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy vs conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22 (01) 40-44
- 56 Magrina JF, Espada M, Kho RM, Cetta R, Chang YH, Magtibay PM. Surgical excision of advanced endometriosis: perioperative outcomes and impacting factors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22 (06) 944-950
- 57 Siesto G, Ieda N, Rosati R, Vitobello D. Robotic surgery for deep endometriosis: a paradigm shift. Int J Med Robot 2014; 10 (02) 140-146
- 58 Chen SH, Li ZA, Du XP. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2016; 43 (03) 422-426
- 59 Neme RM, Schraibman V, Okazaki S. , et al. Deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis treated with robotic-assisted rectosigmoidectomy. JSLS 2013; 17 (02) 227-234
- 60 Ercoli A, D'asta M, Fagotti A. , et al. Robotic treatment of colorectal endometriosis: technique, feasibility and short-term results. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (03) 722-726
- 61 Araujo SE, Seid VE, Marques RM, Gomes MT. Advantages of the robotic approach to deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: because less is more. J Robot Surg 2016; 10 (02) 165-169
- 62 Pellegrino A, Damiani GR, Trio C. , et al. Robotic shaving technique in 25 patients affected by deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectovaginal space. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22 (07) 1287-1292
- 63 Chammas Jr MF, Kim FJ, Barbarino A. , et al. Asymptomatic rectal and bladder endometriosis: a case for robotic-assisted surgery. Can J Urol 2008; 15 (03) 4097-4100
- 64 Frick AC, Barakat EE, Stein RJ, Mora M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic management of ureteral endometriosis. JSLS 2011; 15 (03) 396-399
- 65 Nezhat C, Hajhosseini B, King LP. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic treatment of bowel, bladder, and ureteral endometriosis. JSLS 2011; 15 (03) 387-392
- 66 Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Gupta JK, Ferrero S. Treatment of endometrioma for improving fertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 209: 81-85
- 67 Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C. , et al; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (03) 400-412
- 68 Nieweglowska D, Hajdyla-Banas I, Pitynski K. , et al. Age-related trends in anti-Mullerian hormone serum level in women with unilateral and bilateral ovarian endometriomas prior to surgery. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 13: 128
- 69 Uncu G, Kasapoglu I, Ozerkan K, Seyhan A, Oral Yilmaztepe A, Ata B. Prospective assessment of the impact of endometriomas and their removal on ovarian reserve and determinants of the rate of decline in ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (08) 2140-2145
- 70 Rustamov O, Krishnan M, Roberts SA, Fitzgerald CT. Effect of salpingectomy, ovarian cystectomy and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on ovarian reserve. Gynecol Surg 2016; 13: 173-178
- 71 Chen Y, Pei H, Chang Y. , et al. The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve and the exploration of related factors assessed by serum anti-Mullerian hormone: a prospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res 2014; 7: 108
- 72 Chang HJ, Han SH, Lee JR. , et al. Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (01) 343-349
- 73 Celik HG, Dogan E, Okyay E. , et al. Effect of laparoscopic excision of endometriomas on ovarian reserve: serial changes in the serum antimüllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (06) 1472-1478
- 74 Muzii L, Di Tucci C, Di Feliciantonio M, Marchetti C, Perniola G, Panici PB. The effect of surgery for endometrioma on ovarian reserve evaluated by antral follicle count: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (10) 2190-2198
- 75 Ding Y, Yuan Y, Ding J, Chen Y, Zhang X, Hua K. Comprehensive assessment of the impact of laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22 (07) 1252-1259
- 76 Vignali M, Mabrouk M, Ciocca E. , et al. Surgical excision of ovarian endometriomas: does it truly impair ovarian reserve? Long term anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) changes after surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41 (11) 1773-1778
- 77 Busacca M, Riparini J, Somigliana E. , et al. Postsurgical ovarian failure after laparoscopic excision of bilateral endometriomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (02) 421-425
- 78 Benaglia L, Somigliana E, Vighi V, Ragni G, Vercellini P, Fedele L. Rate of severe ovarian damage following surgery for endometriomas. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (03) 678-682
- 79 Seyhan A, Ata B, Uncu G. The impact of endometriosis and its treatment on ovarian reserve. Semin Reprod Med 2015; 33 (06) 422-428
- 80 Ata B, Turkgeldi E, Seyhan A, Urman B. Effect of hemostatic method on ovarian reserve following laparoscopic endometrioma excision; comparison of suture, hemostatic sealant, and bipolar desiccation. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22 (03) 363-372
- 81 Hart RJ, Hickey M, Maouris P, Buckett W. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (02) CD004992
- 82 Sanchez AM, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Panina-Bordignon P, Vercellini P, Candiani M. The distinguishing cellular and molecular features of the endometriotic ovarian cyst: from pathophysiology to the potential endometrioma-mediated damage to the ovary. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20 (02) 217-230
- 83 Donnez J, Lousse JC, Jadoul P, Donnez O, Squifflet J. Laparoscopic management of endometriomas using a combined technique of excisional (cystectomy) and ablative surgery. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (01) 28-32
- 84 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (03) 591-598
- 85 Guan X, Nguyen MT, Walsh TM, Kelly B. Robotic single-site endometriosis resection using firefly technology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23 (01) 10-11
- 86 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ. Births in the United States, 2015. NCHS Data Brief 2016; (258) 1-8
- 87 Sofic A, Husic-Selimovic A, Carovac A, Jahic E, Smailbegovic V, Kupusovic J. The significance of MRI evaluation of the uterine junctional zone in the early diagnosis of adenomyosis. Acta Inform Med 2016; 24 (02) 103-106
- 88 Dueholm M, Lundorf E. Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19 (06) 505-512
- 89 Sudderuddin S, Helbren E, Telesca M, Williamson R, Rockall A. MRI appearances of benign uterine disease. Clin Radiol 2014; 69 (11) 1095-1104
- 90 Abbott JA. Adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-A)—pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016; S1521-6934(16)30083-9
- 91 Harada T, Khine YM, Kaponis A, Nikellis T, Decavalas G, Taniguchi F. The impact of adenomyosis on women's fertility. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2016; 71 (09) 557-568
- 92 Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Leyendecker G. Structural abnormalities of the uterine wall in women with endometriosis and infertility visualized by vaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 (01) 76-82
- 93 Kissler S, Hamscho N, Zangos S. , et al. Uterotubal transport disorder in adenomyosis and endometriosis--a cause for infertility. BJOG 2006; 113 (08) 902-908
- 94 Stamatopoulos CP, Mikos T, Grimbizis GF. , et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of adenomyosis and myomas of the uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012; 19 (05) 620-626
- 95 Hunjan T, Davidson A. An unexpected diagnosis of adenomyosis in the subfertile woman. BMJ Case Rep 2015; 2015: bcr2014209012
- 96 Wang CJ, Yuen LT, Chang SD, Lee CL, Soong YK. Use of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery to treat infertile women with localized adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2006; 86 (02) 462.e5-462.e8
- 97 Saremi A, Bahrami H, Salehian P, Hakak N, Pooladi A. Treatment of adenomyomectomy in women with severe uterine adenomyosis using a novel technique. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 28 (06) 753-760
- 98 Fujishita A, Masuzaki H, Khan KN, Kitajima M, Ishimaru T. Modified reduction surgery for adenomyosis. A preliminary report of the transverse H incision technique. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2004; 57 (03) 132-138
- 99 Barton SE, Gargiulo AR. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and adenomyomectomy with a flexible CO2 laser device. J Robot Surg 2013; 7 (02) 157-162
- 100 Chung YJ, Kang SY, Choi MR, Cho HH, Kim JH, Kim MR. Robot-assisted laparoscopic adenomyomectomy for patients who want to preserve fertility. Yonsei Med J 2016; 57 (06) 1531-1534
- 101 Kishi Y, Yabuta M, Taniguchi F. Who will benefit from uterus-sparing surgery in adenomyosis-associated subfertility?. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (03) 802-807.e1
- 102 Nagao Y, Osato K, Kubo M, Kawamura T, Ikeda T, Yamawaki T. Spontaneous uterine rupture in the 35th week of gestation after laparoscopic adenomyomectomy. Int Med Case Rep J 2015; 9: 1-4
- 103 Yazawa H, Endo S, Hayashi S, Suzuki S, Ito A, Fujimori K. Spontaneous uterine rupture in the 33rd week of IVF pregnancy after laparoscopically assisted enucleation of uterine adenomatoid tumor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011; 37 (05) 452-457
- 104 Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kuroda K, Jinushi M. Diagnosis, laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: a review of nine cases. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (03) 862-868
- 105 Akar ME, Leezer KH, Yalcinkaya TM. Robot-assisted laparoscopic management of a case with juvenile cystic adenomyoma. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (03) e55-e56 , author reply e57
- 106 Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J, Mosher W. Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013. Natl Health Stat Rep 2015; (86) 1-14
- 107 Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Tylor LR, Peterson HB. Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93 (06) 889-895
- 108 Schmidt JE, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Jeng G, Peterson HB. Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Fertil Steril 2000; 74 (05) 892-898
- 109 Messinger LB, Alford CE, Csokmay JM. , et al. Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation. Fertil Steril 2015; 104 (01) 32-8.e4
- 110 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015; 103 (06) e37-e43
- 111 Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999; 9 (01) 107-113
- 112 Dharia Patel SP, Steinkampf MP, Whitten SJ, Malizia BA. Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (04) 1175-1179
- 113 Goldberg JM, Falcone T. Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (01) 145-147
- 114 Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadière GB. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 2000; 74 (05) 1020-1023
- 115 Caillet M, Vandromme J, Rozenberg S, Paesmans M, Germay O, Degueldre M. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (05) 1844-1847
- 116 Dubuisson JB, Swolin K. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis (the one stitch technique): preliminary results. Hum Reprod 1995; 10 (08) 2044-2046
- 117 Kavoussi SK, Kavoussi KM, Lebovic DI. Robotic-assisted tubal anastomosis with one-stitch technique. J Robot Surg 2014; 8 (02) 133-136
- 118 Carbonnel M, Goetgheluck J, Frati A, Even M, Ayoubi JM. Robot-assisted laparoscopy for infertility treatment: current views. Fertil Steril 2014; 101 (03) 621-626
- 119 Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?. Urology 2002; 60 (01) 39-45 , discussion 45
- 120 Hubert N, Gilles M, Desbrosses K, Meyer JP, Felblinger J, Hubert J. Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon's physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures. Int J Med Robot 2013; 9 (02) 142-147
- 121 Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (06) 1375-1380
- 122 Deffieux X, Morin Surroca M, Faivre E, Pages F, Fernandez H, Gervaise A. Tubal anastomosis after tubal sterilization: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283 (05) 1149-1158
- 123 Vlahos NF, Bankowski BJ, King JA, Shiller DA. Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis using robotics: experience from a teaching institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17 (02) 180-185
- 124 Park JH, Cho S, Choi YS, Seo SK, Lee BS. Robot-assisted segmental resection of tubal pregnancy followed by end-to-end reanastomosis for preserving tubal patency and fertility: An initial report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (41) e4714
- 125 Lorente González J, Ríos Castillo JE, Pomares Toro E, Romero Nieto MI, Castelo-Branco C, Arjona Berral JE. Essure a novel option for the treatment of hydrosalpinx: a case series and literature review. Gynecol Endocrinol 2016; 32 (02) 166-170
- 126 Dreyer K, Lier MC, Emanuel MH. , et al. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT. Hum Reprod 2016; 31 (09) 2005-2016
- 127 Salem SA, Peck AC, Salem RD, Sills ES. Can laparoscopic removal of Essure device before embryo transfer correct poor reproductive outcome pattern in IVF? A case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2014; 41 (02) 219-222
- 128 Gargiulo AR, Greenberg J, Sotrel G. Robot-assisted laparoscopic tubocornual anastomosis for reversal of Essure sterilization procedure. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: S159
- 129 Shortle B, Jewelewicz R. Uterine rupture following tubal reimplantation. Review of the literature and report of three additional cases. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1984; 39 (07) 407-415
- 130 Monteith CW, Berger GS. Successful pregnancies after removal of intratubal microinserts. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (2, Pt 2): 470-472
- 131 Monteith CW, Berger GS, Zerden ML. Pregnancy success after hysteroscopic sterilization reversal. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (06) 1183-1189
- 132 Monteith CW, Berger GS. Normal pregnancy after outpatient tubouterine implantation in patient with Adiana sterilization. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (01) e45-e46
- 133 Dickey RM, Pastuszak AW, Hakky TS, Chandrashekar A, Ramasamy R, Lipshultz LI. The evolution of vasectomy reversal. Curr Urol Rep 2015; 16 (06) 40
- 134 Patel AP, Smith RP. Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update. Asian J Androl 2016; 18 (03) 365-371
- 135 Nseyo U, Patel N, Hsieh TC. Vasectomy reversal surgical patterns: an analysis of the American Board of Urology Case Logs. Urology 2016; S0090-4295(16)30838-X
- 136 Autorino R, Zargar H, Kaouk JH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: recent advances in urology. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (04) 939-949
- 137 Kavoussi PK. Validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal. Asian J Androl 2015; 17 (02) 245-247
- 138 Parekattil SJ. Commentary on “validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal” by Dr. Parviz K Kavoussi. Asian J Androl 2015; 17 (02) 333
- 139 Parekattil SJ, Gudeloglu A, Brahmbhatt J, Wharton J, Priola KB. Robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal: technique and prospective database control trial. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (07) 435-444
- 140 Santomauro MG, Choe CH, L'Esperance JO, Auge BK. Robotic vasovasostomy: description of technique and review of initial results. J Robot Surg 2012; 6 (03) 217-221
- 141 Marshall MT, Doudt AD, Berger JH, Auge BK, Christman MS, Choe CH. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy using a single layer anastomosis. J Robot Surg 2016
- 142 Trost L, Parekattil S, Wang J, Hellstrom WJ. Intracorporeal robot-assisted microsurgical vasovasostomy for the treatment of bilateral Vasal obstruction occurring following bilateral inguinal hernia repairs with mesh placement. J Urol 2014; 191 (04) 1120-1125
- 143 Gudeloglu A, Brahmbhatt JV, Parekattil SJ. Robotic microsurgery in male infertility and urology-taking robotics to the next level. Transl Androl Urol 2014; 3 (01) 102-112
- 144 Estes SJ. Fertility preservation in children and adolescents. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2015; 44 (04) 799-820
- 145 Gargiulo AR. Fertility preservation and the role of robotics. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 54 (03) 431-448
- 146 Al-Badawi I, Al-Aker M, Tulandi T. Robotic-assisted ovarian transposition before radiation. Surg Technol Int 2010; 19: 141-143
- 147 Molpus KL, Wedergren JS, Carlson MA. Robotically assisted endoscopic ovarian transposition. JSLS 2003; 7 (01) 59-62
- 148 Akar ME, Carrillo AJ, Jennell JL, Yalcinkaya TM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ovarian tissue transplantation. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (03) 1120.e5-1120.e8
- 149 Gubbala K, Laios A, Gallos I, Pathiraja P, Haldar K, Ind T. Outcomes of ovarian transposition in gynaecological cancers; a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res 2014; 7: 69
- 150 Moawad NS, Santamaria E, Rhoton-Vlasak A, Lightsey JL. Laparoscopic ovarian transposition before pelvic cancer treatment: ovarian function and fertility preservation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24 (01) 28-35
- 151 Hwang JH, Yoo HJ, Park SH. , et al. Association between the location of transposed ovary and ovarian function in patients with uterine cervical cancer treated with (postoperative or primary) pelvic radiotherapy. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (06) 1387-93.e1 , 2
- 152 Lipskind ST, Gargiulo AR. Computer-assisted laparoscopy in fertility preservation and reproductive surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20 (04) 435-445
- 153 Oktay K, Bedoschi G, Pacheco F, Turan V, Emirdar V. First pregnancies, live birth, and in vitro fertilization outcomes after transplantation of frozen-banked ovarian tissue with a human extracellular matrix scaffold using robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (01) 94.e1-9
- 154 Beavis AL, Salazar-Marioni S, Sinno AK. , et al. Sentinel lymph node detection rates using indocyanine green in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143 (02) 302-306
- 155 Finger TN, Nezhat FR. Robotic-assisted fertility-sparing surgery for early ovarian cancer. JSLS 2014; 18 (02) 308-313
- 156 Johansen G, Lönnerfors C, Falconer H, Persson J. Reproductive and oncologic outcome following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 141 (01) 160-165
- 157 Persson J, Imboden S, Reynisson P, Andersson B, Borgfeldt C, Bossmar T. Reproducibility and accuracy of robot-assisted laparoscopic fertility sparing radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 127 (03) 484-488
- 158 Chuang LT, Lerner DL, Liu CS, Nezhat FR. Fertility-sparing robotic-assisted radical trachelectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15 (06) 767-770
- 159 Nick AM, Frumovitz MM, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT. Fertility sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: open vs. robotic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 124 (02) 276-280
- 160 Bentivegna E, Gouy S, Maulard A, Chargari C, Leary A, Morice P. Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17 (06) e240-e253
- 161 Roman H, Darwish B, Provost D, Baste JM. Laparoscopic management of diaphragmatic endometriosis by three different approaches. Fertil Steril 2016; 106 (02) e1
- 162 Vitobello D, Fattizzi N, Santoro G. , et al. Robotic surgery and standard laparoscopy: a surgical hybrid technique for use in colorectal endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013; 39 (01) 217-222
- 163 Winder JS, Juza RM, Sasaki J. , et al. Implementing a robotics curriculum at an academic general surgery training program: our initial experience. J Robot Surg 2016; 10 (03) 209-213
- 164 Guend H, Widmar M, Patel S. , et al. Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves. Surg Endosc 2016
- 165 Vasudevan V, Reusche R, Wallace H, Kaza S. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (12) 5490-5493
- 166 Estes S, Goldenberg D, Winder J, Juza R, Lyn-Sue J. Best practices for robotic surgery programs. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2017 ; in press
- 167 Wang CJ, Wu PY, Kuo HH, Yu HT, Huang CY, Tseng HT. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (NAOC vs. LOC): a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (03) 1227-1234
- 168 Rattner D, Kalloo A. ; ASGE/SAGES Working Group. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc 2006; 20 (02) 329-333
- 169 Song T, Kim TJ, Lee SH, Kim TH, Kim WY. Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2015; 104 (05) 1325-1331
- 170 Sobolewski C, Yeung Jr PP, Hart S. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2011; 38 (04) 741-755
- 171 Gargiulo AR, Nezhat C. Robot-assisted laparoscopy, natural orifice transluminal endoscopy, and single-site laparoscopy in reproductive surgery. Semin Reprod Med 2011; 29 (02) 155-168
- 172 Lewis EI, Srouji SS, Gargiulo AR. Robotic single-site myomectomy: initial report and technique. Fertil Steril 2015; 103 (05) 1370-7.e1
- 173 Gargiulo AR, Lewis EI, Kaser DJ, Srouji SS. Robotic single-site myomectomy: a step-by-step tutorial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22 (6S): S135
- 174 Gargiulo AR, Choussein S, Srouji SS, Cedo LE, Escobar PF. Coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy. J Robot Surg 2017; 11 (01) 27-35
- 175 Moawad GN, Samuel D, Abi Khalil ED. Tips and tricks: single-site robotic-assisted myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23 (06) 861
- 176 Bush AJ, Morris SN, Millham FH, Isaacson KB. Women's preferences for minimally invasive incisions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18 (05) 640-643
- 177 Goebel K, Goldberg JM. Women's preference of cosmetic results after gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21 (01) 64-67
- 178 Angioni S, Pontis A, Cela V, Sedda F, Genazzani AD, Nappi L. Surgical technique of endometrioma excision impacts on the ovarian reserve. Single-port access laparoscopy versus multiport access laparoscopy: a case control study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2015; 31 (06) 454-457
- 179 Peters A, Rindos NB, Lee T. Hemostasis during ovarian cystectomy: systematic review of the impact of suturing versus surgical energy on ovarian function. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24 (02) 235-246
- 180 Gargiulo A, Feltmate C, Srouji S. Robotic single-site excision of ovarian endometrioma. Fertil Res Pract 2015; 1: 1-3
- 181 Gordts S, Watrelot A, Campo R, Brosens I. Risk and outcome of bowel injury during transvaginal pelvic endoscopy. Fertil Steril 2001; 76 (06) 1238-1241
- 182 Campo R, Gordts S, Brosens I. Minimally invasive exploration of the female reproductive tract in infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2002; 4 (Suppl. 03) 40-45
- 183 Jallad K, Siff L, Thomas T, Paraiso MF. Salpingo-oophorectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (02) 293-296
- 184 Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A. , et al. The German Registry for Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 2010; 252 (02) 263-270
- 185 Bulian DR, Kaehler G, Magdeburg R. , et al. Analysis of the first 217 appendectomies of the German NOTES Registry. Ann Surg 2017; 265 (03) 534-538
- 186 Escobar PF, Starks D, Fader AN, Catenacci M, Falcone T. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice surgery in gynecology. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (07) 2497-2502
- 187 Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chock A. Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 2009; 23 (08) 1770-1774
- 188 Goyal N, Setabutr D, Goldenberg D. Transoral robotic study of the vascular anatomy of the head and neck. J Robot Surg 2014; 8 (01) 57-61
- 189 Gross ND, Holsinger FC, Magnuson JS. , et al. Robotics in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: Recommendations for training and credentialing: A report of the 2015 AHNS education committee, AAO-HNS robotic task force and AAO-HNS sleep disorders committee. Head Neck 2016; 38 (Suppl. 01) E151-E158
- 190 Remacle M, MN Prasad V, Lawson G, Plisson L, Bachy V, Van der Vorst S. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with the Medrobotics Flex™ System: first surgical application on humans. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (06) 1451-1455
- 191 Lang S, Mattheis S, Hasskamp P. , et al. A European multicenter study evaluating the flex robotic system in transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (02) 391-395
- 192 American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology 2011; 114 (03) 495-511
- 193 Kondo W, Ribeiro R, Zomer MT. Fast-track surgery in intestinal deep infiltrating endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21 (02) 285-290
- 194 Kalogera E, Dowdy SC. Enhanced recovery pathway in gynecologic surgery: improving outcomes through evidence-based medicine. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2016; 43 (03) 551-573
- 195 Miralpeix E, Nick AM, Meyer LA. , et al. A call for new standard of care in perioperative gynecologic oncology practice: impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 141 (02) 371-378
- 196 Kantartzis KL, Shepherd JP. The use of mechanical bowel preparation in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (05) 721.e1-721.e5
- 197 Won H, Maley P, Salim S, Rao A, Campbell NT, Abbott JA. Surgical and patient outcomes using mechanical bowel preparation before laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (03) 538-546
- 198 Lönnerfors C, Reynisson P, Geppert B, Persson J. The effect of increased experience on complications in robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease. J Robot Surg 2015; 9 (04) 321-330