Intra- and Intersubject Variability in Audiometric Measures and Loudness Judgments in Older Listeners with Normal Hearing

Abstract

This research was to document intra- and intersubject variability in measures of pure tone thresholds, loudness discomfort levels, and the Contour test of loudness for tonal and speech stimuli across 8 to 10 repeated test sessions over a period of almost 1 year in a group of 11 normal-hearing, older middle-aged adults (39 to 73 years, mean of 56 years). The measured pure tone thresholds and loudness discomfort levels were determined to be stable across sessions, with variability on the order of 5 dB. The categorical judgments for the Contour test for both warbled tones and spondaic speech stimuli decreased over time in level required for categories greater than comfortable. This result contrasts with reports of a slight increase over time when young, normal-hearing adults were tested in comparable measures. The intrasubject variability in the Contour test results was greatest for the 4,000-Hz tonal stimulus for which the largest time effects were observed. The intersubject variability was typically greater than the intrasubject variability and typically increased as the loudness category increased, with some exceptions. The results from this study can be used to aid in power and sample size analyses using these measures in future studies designed to compare effects of treatments based on changes in loudness judgments over time.

Keywords

Sound tolerance - loudness discomfort level - pure tone threshold - categorical loudness judgments

• References

• 1 Brown RE. Experimental studies on the reliability of audiometry. J Laryngol Otol 1948; 62 (8) 487-524
• 2 Corso JF, Cohen A. Methodological aspects of auditory threshold measurements. J Exp Psychol 1958; 55 (1) 8-12
• 3 Hickling S. Studies on the reliability of auditory threshold values. J Aud Res 1966; 6: 39-46
• 4 Wertheimer M. The variability of auditory and visual absolute thresholds in time. J Gen Psychol 1955; 52: 111-147
• 5 Nixon JC, Glorig A, High WS. Changes in air and bone conduction thresholds as a function of age. J Laryngol Otol 1962; 76: 288-298
• 6 Hughson W, Westlake HD. Manual for program outline for rehabilitation of aural casualties both military and civilan. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1944; ;(Suppl): 3-15
• 7 Carhart R, Jerger JF. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 1959; 24: 330-345
• 8 Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry. ASHA 1978; 20 (4) 297-301
• 9 Schmuziger N, Probst R, Smurzynski J. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones. Ear Hear 2004; 25 (2) 127-132
• 10 Divenyi PL, Stark PB, Haupt KM. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118 (2) 1089-1100
• 11 Lee FS, Matthews LJ, Dubno JR, Mills JH. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons. Ear Hear 2005; 26 (1) 1-11
• 12 Sherlock LP, Formby C. Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (2) 85-100
• 13 Skinner MW. Hearing Aid Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1988
• 14 Keller JN. Loudness discomfort levels: a retrospective study comparing data from Pascoe (1988) and Washington University School of Medicine, Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences. St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine; 2006
• 15 Mueller HG, Bentler RA. Fitting hearing aids using clinical measures of loudness discomfort levels: an evidence-based review of effectiveness. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (7) 461-472
• 16 Silverman SR. Tolerance for pure tones and speech in normal and defective hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1947; 56 (3) 658-677
• 17 Morgan DE, Wilson RH, Dirks DD. Loudness discomfort level: selected methods and stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56 (2) 577-581
• 18 Kamm C, Dirks DD, Mickey MR. Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21 (4) 668-681
• 19 Goldstein B, Shulman A. Tinnitus—hyperacusis and the loudness discomfort level test—a preliminary report. Int Tinnitus J 1996; 2: 83-89
• 20 Kiessling J, Schubert M, Archut A. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt). Scand Audiol 1996; 25 (3) 153-160
• 21 Moore BC, Lynch C, Stone MA. Effects of the fitting parameters of a two-channel compression system on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in noise. Br J Audiol 1992; 26 (6) 369-379
• 22 Allen JB, Hall JL, Jeng PS. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB)—a procedure for the assessment of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88 (2) 745-753
• 23 Robinson K, Gatehouse S. Test-retest reliability of loudness scaling. Ear Hear 1996; 17 (2) 120-123
• 24 Cox RM, Alexander GC, Taylor IM, Gray GA. The contour test of loudness perception. Ear Hear 1997; 18 (5) 388-400
• 25 Beattie RC, Huynh RC, Ngo VN, Jones RL. IHAFF loudness contour test: reliability and effects of approach mode in normal-hearing subjects. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8 (4) 243-256
• 26 Rasmussen AN, Olsen SO, Borgkvist BV, Nielsen LH. Long-term test-retest reliability of category loudness scaling in normal-hearing subjects using pure-tone stimuli. Scand Audiol 1998; 27 (3) 161-167
• 27 Formby C, Hawley ML, Sherlock LP , et al. A sound therapy-based intervention to expand the auditory dynamic range for loudness among persons with sensorineural hearing losses: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Semin Hear 2015; 36 (2) 77-110
• 28 Formby C, Payne J, Yang X, Wu D, Parton JM. Repeated measurement of absolute and relative judgments of loudness: clinical relevance for prescriptive fitting of aided target gains for “soft”, “comfortable”, and “loud, but OK” sound levels. Semin Hear 2017; 38 (1) 27-50
• 29 Humes LE, Wilson DL. An examination of changes in hearing-aid performance and benefit in the elderly over a 3-year period of hearing-aid use. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46 (1) 137-145
• 30 Humes LE, Wilson DL, Barlow NN, Garner C. Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45 (4) 772-782