Prophylactic Venous Supercharged Radial Collateral Artery Perforator Propeller Flap: Improved Outcome in Perforator Propeller Flaps

Propeller flaps provide a safe and reliable reconstructive option. Following flap rotation intraoperatively, a degree of venous stasis occurs. Difficulty lies in predicting whether this is likely to be transient or not. These flaps are therefore frequently at risk of venous congestion which can result in partial or total flap necrosis.[1] This results in delayed wound healing and often necessitates further surgical procedures to achieve the final outcome. This defeats the original intention of performing a reliable, one-stage, and aesthetically pleasing reconstructive technique. Subsequent management of flap necrosis can include conservative and surgical management. Long-term dressings and negative pressure therapy, with or without eventual skin grafting, will result in wound healing, but can take time and are incapacitating for patients. The final result, by these means, can potentially negatively impact upper limb function in terms of scar contracture and appear less aesthetically pleasing. We present two prophylactically venous supercharged radial collateral artery perforator (RCAP) propeller flaps in the upper limb and suggest this is a more reliable approach than the standard RCAP flap technique.

• References

• 1 Innocenti M, Menichini G, Baldrighi C, Delcroix L, Vignini L, Tos P. Are there risk factors for complications of perforator-based propeller flaps for lower-extremity reconstruction?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (7) 2276-2286
• 2 Murakami M, Ono S, Ishii N, Hyakusoku H. Reconstruction of elbow region defects using radial collateral artery perforator (RCAP)-based propeller flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (10) 1418-1421
• 3 Song D, Xu J, Lv H, Liu J, Li J. Wraparound chimeric radial collateral artery perforator flap for reconstruction of thumb loss. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (2) 95-101