Morphometric Analysis of Atlas and Its Clinical Significance: An Anatomical Study of Indian Human Atlas Vertebrae

Abstract

The morphometry of atlas is very important for surgeries in the occipitocervical region. There are studies explicitly differing in the results concerning some key anatomic measurements, mandating an additional evaluation of anatomic landmarks of atlas. Therefore, this study was aimed to evaluate the various dimensions of the atlas quantitatively relevant for various surgeries. A total of 30 adult atlas vertebrae of Indian origin were studied. The distances were measured by digital vernier calliper. The transverse diameter and maximum anteroposterior dimension of vertebral canal of atlas had a mean of 27.31 ± 2.74 and 29.44 ± 2.54 mm, respectively. The vertebral artery groove thickness on atlas is 3.79 ± 1.08 mm on right and 4.05 ± 00.86 mm on left, respectively. The mean distance from sagittal midline to the innermost edge of the vertebral artery groove is 10.73 ± 2.92 mm on right side and 09.72 ± 2.56 mm on left side. Overall, 74% of superior articular facets were found to be oval in shape and 26% in kidney shape. On the basis of these findings, we concluded that the thickness of the vertebral artery groove is satisfactory for surgical fixation techniques and the dissection on the posterior arch of atlas can be extended to 12 mm from the midline through the posterior approach.

Keywords

atlas - vertebral artery groove - posterior screw placement - lateral mass - superior articular facet

• References

• 1 Apfelbaum RI. Anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures. In: Rengachary SS, and Wilkins RH. , eds. Neurosurgical Operative Atlas. Vol 4. Illinois, IL: AANS; 1995: 19-28
• 2 Dickman CA, Hurlbert RJ. Cannulated screws for odontoid and atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation. In: Rengachary SS, and Wilkins RH. , eds. Neurosurgical Operative Atlas. Vol 7. Illinois, IL: AANS; 1998: 29-41
• 3 Gupta S, Goel A. Quantitative anatomy of the lateral masses of the atlas and axis vertebrae. Neurol India 2000; 48 (2) 120-125
• 4 Miller RJ, Ramage JD. Absence of symmetry in superior articular facets on the first cervical vertebra in humans: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1994; 17 (9) 624-626
• 5 Madawi AA, Casey AT, Solanki GA, Tuite G, Veres R, Crockard HA. Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique. J Neurosurg 1997; 86 (6) 961-968
• 6 Mandel IM, Kambach BJ, Petersilge CA, Johnstone B, Yoo JU. Morphologic considerations of C2 isthmus dimensions for the placement of transarticular screws. Spine 2000; 25 (12) 1542-1547
• 7 Goel A, Desai KI, Muzumdar DP. Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (6) 1351-1356 , discussion 1356–1357
• 8 Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 2001; 26 (22) 2467-2471
• 9 Levine AM, Edwards CC. Fractures of the atlas. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73 (5) 680-691
• 10 Oda I, Abumi K, Sell LC, Haggerty CJ, Cunningham BW, McAfee PC. Biomechanical evaluation of five different occipito-atlanto-axial fixation techniques. Spine 1999; 24 (22) 2377-2382
• 11 Resnick DK, Lapsiwala S, Trost GR. Anatomic suitability of the C1-C2 complex for pedicle screw fixation. Spine 2002; 27 (14) 1494-1498
• 12 Richter M, Schmidt R, Claes L, Puhl W, Wilke HJ. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques. Spine 2002; 27 (16) 1724-1732
• 13 Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Heck B. The quantitative anatomy of the vertebral artery groove of the atlas and its relation to the posterior atlantoaxial approach. Spine 1998; 23 (3) 320-323
• 14 Hong X, Dong Y, Yunbing C, Qingshui Y, Shizheng Z, Jingfa L. Posterior screw placement on the lateral mass of atlas: an anatomic study. Spine 2004; 29 (5) 500-503
• 15 Li L, Wang H, Cui S. Application of atlas pedicle screw system fixation and fusion for treatment of upper cervical disease [in Chinese]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2007; 21 (5) 461-464
• 16 Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Zhong SZ. Anatomic considerations for the pedicle screw placement in the first cervical vertebra. Spine 2005; 30 (13) 1519-1523
• 17 Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH , et al. C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities. Spine 2009; 34 (4) 371-377
• 18 Tan M, Wang H, Wang Y , et al. Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass. Spine 2003; 28 (9) 888-895
• 19 Sengul G, Kadioglu HH. Morphometric anatomy of the Atlas and Axis vertebrae. Turk Neurosurg 2006; 16 (2) 69-76
• 20 Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, Lotz JC, Harms J, Bradford DS. Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Spine 2002; 27 (22) 2435-2440
• 21 Panjabi MM, Shin EK, Chen NC, Wang JL. Internal morphology of human cervical pedicles. Spine 2000; 25 (10) 1197-1205
• 22 Wright NM, Lauryssen C ; American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Vertebral artery injury in C1-2 transarticular screw fixation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. J Neurosurg 1998; 88 (4) 634-640
• 23 Currier BL, Maus TP, Eck JC, Larson DR, Yaszemski MJ. Relationship of the internal carotid artery to the anterior aspect of the C1 vertebra: implications for C1-C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass fixation. Spine 2008; 33 (6) 635-639
• 24 Eck JC, Walker MP, Currier BL, Chen Q, Yaszemski MJ, An KN. Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20 (7) 505-508
• 25 Lang J , ed. Skull Base and Related Structures. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1995: 292
• 26 Doherty BJ, Heggeness MH. The quantitative anatomy of the atlas. Spine 1994; 19 (22) 2497-2500