Open Access
Endosc Int Open 2015; 03(03): E216-E222
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391480
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Double-balloon enteroscopy for ERCP in patients with Billroth II anatomy: results of a large series of papillary large-balloon dilation for biliary stone removal

Chi-Liang Cheng
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Nai-Jen Liu
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Jui-Hsiang Tang
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Ming-Chin Yu
2   Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Yi-Ning Tsui
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Fang-Yu Hsu
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Ching-Song Lee
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
,
Cheng-Hui Lin
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 12. September 2014

accepted after revision 07. Januar 2015

Publikationsdatum:
06. Mai 2015 (online)

Preview

Background and study aims: Data on double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE)-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogrphy (ERCP) in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy and the use of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) for the removal of common bile duct stones in Billroth II anatomy are limited. The aims of the study were to evaluate the success of DBE-assisted ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy and examine the efficacy of EPLBD ( ≥ 10 mm) for the removal of common bile duct stones.

Patients and methods: A total of 77 patients with Billroth II gastrectomy in whom standard ERCP had failed underwent DBE-assisted ERCP. DBE success was defined as visualizing the papilla and ERCP success as completing the intended intervention. The clinical results of EPLBD for the removal of common bile duct stones were analyzed.

Results: DBE was successful in 73 of 77 patients (95 %), and ERCP success was achieved in 67 of these 73 (92 %). Therefore, the rate of successful DBE-assisted ERCP was 87 % (67 of a total of 77 patients). The reasons for ERCP failure (n = 10) included tumor obstruction (n = 2), adhesion obstruction (n = 2), failed cannulation (n = 3), failed stone removal (n = 2), and bowel perforation (n = 1). Overall DBE-assisted ERCP complications occurred in 5 of 77 patients (6.5 %). A total of 48 patients (34 male, mean age 75.5 years) with common bile duct stones underwent EPLBD. Complete stone removal in the first session was accomplished in 36 patients (75 %); mechanical lithotripsy was required in 1 patient. EPLBD-related mild perforation occurred in 2 patients (4 %). No acute pancreatitis occurred.

Conclusions: DBE permits therapeutic ERCP in patients who have a difficult Billroth II gastrectomy with a high success rate and acceptable complication rates. EPLBD is effective and safe for the removal of common bile duct stones in patients with Billroth II anatomy.