A Key Role for Abdominal Ultrasound Examination in ”Difficult” Diagnoses of Celiac Disease

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Untersuchung der Wertigkeit des abdominalen Ultraschalls (US) in der diagnostischen Abklärung von Patienten mit Verdacht auf Zöliakie (CD) mit negativen Serum-Antikörpern und unklarer Diagnose. Material und Methoden: 524 konsekutive Patienten mit für die CD-typischen Symptomen erhielten eine umfangreiche diagnostische Abklärung. 76 (14 %) wurden wegen positiver Serum-Anti-tTG und/oder EmA-Antikörpern ausgeschlossen. Weitere 377 Patienten wurden ausgeschlossen, da bei ihnen eine andere Diagnose als CD gestellt wurde oder sie HLA-DQ2- oder DQ 8-negativ waren. Bei 71 Patienten war die Diagnose einer seronegativen CD wahrscheinlich, diese erhielten eine abdominale US-Untersuchung und eine Duodenum-Biopsie zur histologischen Untersuchung. Ergebnisse: Die intestinale histologische Untersuchung und der folgende klinische und histologische Verlauf bestätigte die Diagnose einer CD bei 12 Patienten (Gruppe 1) und schloss sie bei 59 Patienten aus (Gruppe 2). Im abdominalen Ultraschall hatte das Vorhandensein dilatierter Darmschlingen und verdickter Dünndarmwände eine Sensitivität von 83 % und einen negativ prädiktiven Wert (NPV) von 95 % für die Diagnose einer CD. Zudem hatten 11 / 12 seronegativen CD-Patienten mindestens einen der zwei Ultraschall-Marker. Bei Berücksichtigung nur eines dieser zwei Ultraschall-Marker erhöhte sich die Sensitivität des abdominalen US auf 92 % und der NPV auf 98 %. Schlussfolgerung: Abdominaler US erweist sich in der diagnostischen Abklärung von Patienten mit hochgradigem CD-Verdacht und Seronegativität als wertvolle Untersuchungsmethode.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of abdominal ultrasound examination (US) for the diagnostic workup of cases of suspected CD involving negative serum antibodies and difficult diagnosis. Materials and Methods: 524 consecutive patients with symptoms of suspected CD underwent an extensive diagnostic workup. 76 (14 %) were excluded since they were positive for serum anti-tTG and/or EmA antibodies. 377 were excluded since they were diagnosed with something other than CD or did not have the alleles encoding for HLA DQ 2 or DQ 8. A diagnosis of CD with negative serum antibodies was probable in 71 patients who underwent abdominal US and duodenal biopsy for histology evaluation. Results: Intestinal histology and subsequent clinical and histological follow-up confirmed the CD diagnosis in 12 patients (GROUP 1) and excluded it in 59 subjects (GROUP 2). Abdominal US showed that the presence of dilated bowel loops and a thickened small bowel wall had a sensitivity of 83 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95 % in CD diagnosis. Furthermore, in 11 of the 12 CD seronegative patients there was at least one of these two abdominal US signs. Therefore, considering the presence of one of these two signs, abdominal US sensitivity increased to 92 % and NPV to 98 %. Conclusion: Abdominal US is useful in the diagnostic workup of patients with a high clinical suspicion of CD but with negative serology.

celiac disease - ultrasound - sensitivity - specificity - serology

References

• 1 Maki M, Mustalahti K, Kokkonen J. et al . Prevalence of celiac disease among children in Finland.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  348 2517-2524
• 2 Green P H, Fleischauer A T, Bhagat G. et al . Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease.  Am J Med. 2003;  115 191-195
• 3 Meyer D, Stavropolous S, Diamond B. et al . Osteoporosis in a North American adult population with celiac disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 112
• 4 Fasano A, Catassi C. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease: an evolving spectrum.  Gastroenterology. 2001;  120 636-651
• 5 Dahele A, Kingstone K, Bode J. et al . Anti-endomysial Antibody Negative Celiac Disease. Does Additional Serological Testing Help?.  Dig Dis Sci. 2001;  46 214-221
• 6 Carroccio A, Di Prima L, Pirrone G. et al . Anti-transglutaminase antibody assay of the culture medium of intestinal biopsy specimens can improve the accuracy of celiac disease diagnosis.  Clin Chem. 2006;  52 1175-1180
• 7 Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti G M. Prevalence of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in different degrees of intestinal damage in celiac disease.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;  36 219-221
• 8 Rostami K, Kerckhaert J, Tiemessen R. et al . Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 888-894
• 9 Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P. et al . Adult celiac disease: US signs.  Radiology. 1999;  211 389-394
• 10 Fraquelli M, Bardella M T, Peracchi M. et al . Gallbladder emptying and somatostatin and cholecystokinin plasma levels in celiac disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 1866-1870
• 11 Fraquelli M, Colli A, Colucci A. et al . Accuracy of ultrasonography in predicting celiac disease.  Arch Intern Med. 2004;  164 169-174
• 12 Dietrich C F, Brunner V, Seifert H. et al . Intestinal B-mode sonography in patients with endemic sprue. Intestinal sonography in endemic sprue.  Ultraschall in Med. 1999;  20 242-247
• 13 Brocchi E, Corazza G R, Caletti G. et al . Endoscopic demonstration of loss of duodenal folds in the diagnosis of celiac disease.  N Engl J Med. 1988;  319 741-744
• 14 Farrell R, Kelly C P. Celiac sprue.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  346 180-188
• 15 Green P, Jabri B. Coeliac disease.  Lancet. 2003;  362 383-391
• 16 Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;  11 1185-1194
• 17 Carroccio A, Vitale G, Di Prima L. et al . Comparison of anti-transglutaminase ELISAs and anti-endomysial antibody assay in the diagnosis of celiac disease: a prospective study.  Clin Chem. 2002;  48 1546-1550
• 18 Carroccio A, Cavataio F, Iacono G. et al . IgA anti-endomysial antibodies on the umbilical cord in diagnosing celiac disease. Sensitivity, specificity and comparative evaluation with the traditional kit.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996;  31 759-763
• 19 Ferguson A, Murray D. Quantitation of intraepithelial lymphocytes in human jejunum.  Gut. 1971;  12 988-994
• 20 Paparo F, Petrone E, Tosco A. et al . Clinical, HLA, and small bowel immuno-histochemical features of children with positive serum antiendomysium antibodies and architecturally normal small intestinal mucosa.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 2294-2298
• 21 Hirche T O, Russler J, Schröder O. et al . The value of routinely performed ultrasonography in patients with Crohn’s disease.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;  37 1178-1183
• 22 Dietrich C F, Zeuzem S, Caspary W F. et al . Ultrasound lymph node imaging in the abdomen and retroperitoneum of healthy probands.  Ultraschall in Med. 1998;  19 265-269
• 23 Gaiani S, Gramantieri L, Venturoli N. et al . What is the criterion for differentiating chronic hepatitis from compensated cirrhosis? A prospective study comparing ultrasonography and percutaneous liver biopsy.  J Hepatol. 1997;  27 679-685
• 24 Mathiesen U L, Franzén L E, Aselius H. et al . Increased liver echogenicity at ultrasound examination reflects degree of steatosis but not of fibrosis in asymptomatic patients with mild/moderate abnormalities of liver transaminases.  Dig Liver Dis. 2002;  34 516-522
• 25 Picardi M, Martinelli V, Ciancia R. et al . Measurement of spleen volume by ultrasound scanning in patients with thrombocytosis: a prospective study.  Blood. 2002;  99 4228-4230
• 26 Bruns D E, Huth E J, Magid E. et al . Toward a checklist for the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy of medical tests.  Clin Chem. 2000;  46 893-895
• 27 Feinstein A. On the sensitivity, specificity and discrimination of diagnostic tests.  Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1975;  17 104-110
• 28 Holmes G K, Prior P, Lane M R. et al . Malignancy in celiac disease – effect of a gluten free diet.  Gut. 1989;  30 333-338
• 29 Catassi C, Bearzi I, Holmes G K. Association of celiac disease and intestinal lymphomas and other cancers.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  128 S79-S86
• 30 Cellier C, Delabesse E, Helmer C. et al . Refractory sprue, coeliac disease, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. French Coeliac Disease Study Group.  Lancet. 2000;  356 203-208 
• 31 Catassi C, Fabiani E, Corrao G. et al . Risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in celiac disease.  JAMA. 2002;  287 1413-1419
• 32 Fasano A. Celiac disease. How to handle a clinical chameleon.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  348 2568-2570
• 33 Walker-Smith J A, Guandalini S, Schmitz J. et al . Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease.  Arch Dis Child. 1990;  65 909-911
• 34 Alaedini A, Green P. Narrative review: Celiac Disease. Understanding a complex autoimmune disorder.  Ann Intern Med. 2005;  142 289-298
• 35 Rostom A, Dubé C, Cranney A. et al .Celiac disease. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 104. AHRQ publication no. 04-E029 – 2 Rockville, MD; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2004
• 36 Peck R J, Jackson A, Gleeson D. Case Report: Ultrasound of Coeliac Disease With Demonstration of Response to Treatment.  Clinical Radiology. 1997;  52 244-245
• 37 Castiglione F, Rispo A, Cozzolino A. et al . Bowel sonography in adult celiac disease: diagnostic accuracy and ultrasonographic features.  Abdom Imaging. 2007;  32 73-77
• 38 Bartusek D, Valek V, Husty J. et al . Small bowel ultrasound in patients with celiac disease: retrospective study.  Eur J Radiol. 2007;  63 302-306
• 39 Sobhani I, Brousse N, Vissuzaine C. et al . A diffuse T lymphocytic gastrointestinal mucosal infiltration associated with Sjögren’s syndrome resulting in a watery diarrhea syndrome and responsive to immunosuppressive therapy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 2584-2586
• 40 Kosnai I, Kuitunen P, Savilahti E. et al . Mast cells and eosinophils in the jejunal mucosa of patients with intestinal cow’s milk allergy and celiac disease of childhood.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984;  3 368-372
• 41 Kuitunen P, Visakorpi J K, Savilahti E. et al . Malabsorption syndrome with cow’s milk intolerance. Clinical findings and course in 54 cases.  Arch Dis Child. 1975;  50 351-356