RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/a-2102-1691
Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leakage after upper gastrointestinal surgery
Autoren
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number (trial ID): NCT05606822 Type of study: Observational/patient registry
Abstract
Background Recently, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) was introduced as treatment for anastomotic leakage after upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the initial experience with EVT for anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery in a tertiary referral center.
Methods Patients treated with EVT for anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery were included retrospectively (January 2018–June 2021) and prospectively (June 2021–October 2021). The primary end point was the EVT success rate. Secondary end points included mortality and adverse events.
Results 38 patients were included (31 men; mean age 66 years): 27 had undergone an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction and 11 a total gastrectomy with esophagojejunal anastomosis. EVT was successful in 28 patients (74 %, 95 %CI 57 %–87 %). In 10 patients, EVT failed: deceased owing to radiation pneumonitis (n = 1), EVT-associated complications (n = 2), and defect closure not achieved (n = 7). Mean duration of successful EVT was 33 days, with a median of six EVT-related endoscopies. Median hospital stay was 45 days.
Conclusion This initial experience with EVT for anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery demonstrated a success rate of 74 %. EVT is a promising therapy that could prevent further major surgery. More experience with the technique and its indications will likely improve success rates in the future.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 28. September 2022
Angenommen nach Revision: 19. Mai 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
30. Mai 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Juli 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Fabbi M, Hagens ERC, van Berge Henegouwen MI. et al. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34: doaa039
- 2 Gisbertz SS, Hagens ERC, Ruurda JP. et al. The evolution of surgical approach for esophageal cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018; 1434: 149-155
- 3 Voeten DM, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP. et al. Overall volume trends in esophageal cancer surgery results from the Dutch upper gastrointestinal cancer audit. Ann Surg 2021; 274: 449-458
- 4 Schmidt HM, Gisbertz SS, Moons J. et al. Defining benchmarks for transthoracic esophagectomy: a multicenter analysis of total minimally invasive esophagectomy in low risk patients. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 814-821
- 5 Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA. et al. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 2011; 28: 29-35
- 6 de Moura DTH, de Moura B, Manfredi MA. et al. Role of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of gastrointestinal transmural defects. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11: 329-344
- 7 Kuhn F, Schardey J, Wirth U. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for the treatment of colorectal leaks - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37: 283-292
- 8 Tavares G, Tustumi F, Tristao LS. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leak in esophagectomy and total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34: doaa132
- 9 Scognamiglio P, Reeh M, Karstens K. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy versus stenting for postoperative esophago-enteric anastomotic leakage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 632-642
- 10 Chan SM, Auyeung KKY, Lam SF. et al. Current status in endoscopic management of upper gastrointestinal perforations, leaks and fistulas. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 43-62
- 11 Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 2017; 152: 292-298
- 12 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
- 13 Aziz M, Haghbin H, Sharma S. et al. Safety and effectiveness of endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure for esophageal defects: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1371-E1380
- 14 do Monte Junior ES, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy versus endoscopic stenting for upper gastrointestinal transmural defects: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2021; 33: 892-902
- 15 Reimer S, Seyfried F, Flemming S. et al. Evolution of endoscopic vacuum therapy for upper gastrointestinal leakage over a 10-year period: a quality improvement study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 9169-9178
- 16 Book T, Wortmann N, Winkler M. et al. Endoscopic vacuum assisted closure (E-VAC) of upper gastrointestinal leakages. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56: 1376-1379
- 17 Jung DH, Huh CW, Min YW. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for the management of upper GI leaks and perforations: a multicenter retrospective study of factors associated with treatment failure (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 281-290
- 18 Loske G, Schorsch T, Rucktaeschel F. et al. Open-pore film drainage (OFD): a new multipurpose tool for endoscopic negative pressure therapy (ENPT). Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E865-E871
- 19 Lange J, Kahler G, Bernhardt J. et al. The VACStent trial: combined treatment of esophageal leaks by covered stent and endoscopic vacuum therapy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37: 3657-3668
- 20 Muller PC, Morell B, Vetter D. et al. Preemptive endoluminal vacuum therapy to reduce morbidity after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: including a novel grading system for postoperative endoscopic assessment of GI-anastomoses. Ann Surg 2021; 274: 751-757