Artificial intelligence-based polyp size measurement in gastrointestinal endoscopy using the auxiliary waterjet as a reference

Abstract

Background Measurement of colorectal polyp size during endoscopy is mainly performed visually. In this work, we propose a novel polyp size measurement system (Poseidon) based on artificial intelligence (AI) using the auxiliary waterjet as a measurement reference.

Methods Visual estimation, biopsy forceps-based estimation, and Poseidon were compared using a computed tomography colonography-based silicone model with 28 polyps of defined sizes. Four experienced gastroenterologists estimated polyp sizes visually and with biopsy forceps. Furthermore, the gastroenterologists recorded images of each polyp with the waterjet in proximity for the application of Poseidon. Additionally, Poseidon's measurements of 29 colorectal polyps during routine clinical practice were compared with visual estimates.

Results In the silicone model, visual estimation had the largest median percentage error of 25.1 % (95 %CI 19.1 %–30.4 %), followed by biopsy forceps-based estimation: median 20.0 % (95 %CI 14.4 %–25.6 %). Poseidon gave a significantly lower median percentage error of 7.4 % (95 %CI 5.0 %–9.4 %) compared with other methods. During routine colonoscopies, Poseidon presented a significantly lower median percentage error (7.7 %, 95 %CI 6.1 %–9.3 %) than visual estimation (22.1 %, 95 %CI 15.1 %–26.9 %).

Conclusion In this work, we present a novel AI-based method for measuring colorectal polyp size with significantly higher accuracy than other common sizing methods.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 03. Januar 2023

Angenommen nach Revision: 19. April 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
20. April 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. Juli 2023

• References

• 1 Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209-249
• 2 Turner KO, Genta RM, Sonnenberg A. Lesions of all types exist in colon polyps of all sizes. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 303-306
• 3 Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 842-864
• 4 Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC. et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 463-485.e5
• 5 Chaptini L, Chaaya A, Depalma F. et al. Variation in polyp size estimation among endoscopists and impact on surveillance intervals. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 652-659
• 6 Eichenseer PJ, Dhanekula R, Jakate S. et al. Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 315-321
• 7 Rubio CA, Grimelius L, Lindholm J. et al. Reliability of the reported size of removed colorectal polyps. Anticancer Res 2006; 26: 4895-4899
• 8 Gourevitch RA, Rose S, Crockett SD. et al. Variation in pathologist classification of colorectal adenomas and serrated polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 431-439
• 9 Jin HY. Use of disposable graduated biopsy forceps improves accuracy of polyp size measurements during endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 623
• 10 Kume K, Watanabe T, Yoshikawa I. et al. Endoscopic measurement of polyp size using a novel calibrated hood. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 1-4
• 11 Shimoda R, Akutagawa T, Tomonaga M. et al. Estimating colorectal polyp size with a virtual scale endoscope and visual estimation during colonoscopy: Prospective, preliminary comparison of accuracy. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 1471-1477
• 12 Konikoff T, Goren I, Yalon M. et al. Machine learning for selecting patients with Crohn's disease for abdominopelvic computed tomography in the emergency department. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53: 1559-1564
• 13 Levy I, Bruckmayer L, Klang E. et al. Artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy does not increase adenoma detection rate in routine clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117: 1871-1873
• 14 Kader R, Cid-Mejias A, Brandao P. et al. Polyp characterisation using deep learning and a publicly accessible polyp video database. Dig Endosc 2022;
• 15 Römmele C, Mendel R, Barrett C. et al. An artificial intelligence algorithm is highly accurate for detecting endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 11115
• 16 Itoh H, Oda M, Jiang K. et al. Binary polyp-size classification based on deep-learned spatial information. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2021; 16: 1817-1828
• 17 Abdelrahim M, Saiga H, Maeda N. et al. Automated sizing of colorectal polyps using computer vision. Gut 2022; 71: 7-9
• 18 Kwak MS, Cha JM, Jeon JW. et al. Artificial intelligence‐based measurement outperforms current methods for colorectal polyp size measurement. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 1188-1195
• 19 Lux TJ, Banck M, Saßmannshausen Z. et al. Pilot study of a new freely available computer-aided polyp detection system in clinical practice. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37: 1349-1354
• 20 Kaltenbach T, Anderson JC, Burke CA. et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions: recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 435-464