Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79(04): 389-395
DOI: 10.1055/a-0774-8617
GebFra Science
Original Article/Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Influence of Different Methods of Intrapartum Analgesia on the Progress of Labour and on Perinatal Outcome

Article in several languages: English | deutsch

Authors

  • Javier U. Ortiz

    1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • Thomas Hammerl

    1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • Maria Wasmaier

    2   Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • Valerie Wienerroither

    1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • Bernhard Haller

    3   Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Statistik und Epidemiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, München
  • Moritz Hamann

    1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • Bettina Kuschel*

    1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
  • Silvia M. Lobmaier*

    1   Sektion für Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

received 23 March 2018
revised 25 October 2018

accepted 27 October 2018

Publication Date:
01 February 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Various methods of intrapartum analgesia are available these days. Pethidine, meptazinol and epidural analgesia are among the most commonly used techniques. A relatively new one is patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil, although the experiences published so far in Germany are limited. Our goal was to study the influence of these analgesic techniques (opioids vs. patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil vs. epidural analgesia) on the second stage of labour and on perinatal outcome.

Material and Methods We conducted a retrospective study with 254 parturients. The women were divided into 4 groups based on the analgesic technique and matched for parity, maternal age and gestational age (opioids n = 64, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil n = 60, epidural analgesia n = 64, controls without the medicinal products mentioned n = 66). Maternal, fetal and neonatal data were analysed.

Results The expulsive stage was prolonged among both primiparas and multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (79 [74] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.016, and 28 [68] vs. 10 [11] min, p < 0.001, respectively) and epidural analgesia (90 [92] vs. 44 [55] min, p = 0.004, and 22.5 [73] vs. 10 [11] min, p = 0.003, respectively) compared with the controls. The length of the pushing stage was similar among primiparas in all groups but prolonged compared with the controls in multiparas with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil (15 [17] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.001) and epidural analgesia (10 [15] vs. 5 [7] min, p = 0.006). The Apgar, umbilical arterial pH and base excess values were similar between the groups, as were the rates of acidosis and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

Conclusion Parturients with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with remifentanil and epidural analgesia showed a prolonged expulsive stage compared with the opioid group and controls. The short-term neonatal outcome was not influenced by the three methods examined.

* B. Kuschel and S. M. Lobmaier are equal last authors.