Postparetic Synkinesis: Objective and Subjective Comparisons of Depressor Anguli Oris Myectomies versus Depressor Anguli Oris and Buccinator Myectomies

Cristina V. Sanchez; Alp Ercan; Shai M. Rozen

doi:10.1055/a-2273-4327

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2273-4327

Original Article

Postparetic Synkinesis: Objective and Subjective Comparisons of Depressor Anguli Oris Myectomies versus Depressor Anguli Oris and Buccinator Myectomies

Cristina V. Sanchez

¹Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

,

Alp Ercan

¹Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

,

Shai M. Rozen

¹Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Background Muscles affected by postparetic synkinesis have imbalanced tonicity that limit perioral mimetic movement and inhibit the ability to smile. The depressor anguli oris (DAO) muscle has been a common myectomy target for the treatment of perioral synkinesis. While addition of buccinator myectomies to DAO myectomies has risen, no studies have analyzed the effects of buccinator myectomies. The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of a DAO myectomy with and without concomitant buccinator myectomy through objective facial metrics and subjective patient-reported outcomes.

Methods This study is a retrospective review of patients with postparetic synkinesis who underwent DAO myectomy (DAO myectomy group) or DAO myectomy with buccinator myectomy (DAO + Buccinator myectomies group). Outcomes included postoperative differences in objective smile measures (smile angle, excursion, and dental show) using validated software and patient-reported outcomes using the Facial Disability Index (FDI) questionnaire and a myectomy-specific questionnaire.

Results After chart review, 18 patients were included in the DAO myectomy group and 19 in the DAO + Buccinator myectomies group. There were no significant postoperative differences between the groups in (1) smile excursion, angle, or dental show at resting, closed smile, or open smile (p > 0.05), (2) FDI physical and social scores, p = 0.198 and 0.932, respectively, or (3) myectomy-specific questionnaire responses (p > 0.05).

Conclusion The addition of a buccinator myectomy to a DAO myectomy does not provide significant clinical benefit when compared with an isolated DAO myectomy, based on objective measures and subjective patient-reported outcomes.

Keywords

synkinesis - facial paralysis - myectomies

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Kanerva M. Buccinator synkinesis treated by botulinum toxin in facial palsy and hemifacial spasms. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (07) 1464-1469
2 Sanchez A, Pannu J, Fuller JC. Facial paralysis: timing of repair and management of the nonflaccidly paralyzed face. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 29 (04) 265-270
3 Patel PN, Owen SR, Norton CP. et al. Outcomes of buccinator treatment with botulinum toxin in facial synkinesis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (03) 196-201
4 Tavares H, Oliveira M, Costa R, Amorim H. Botulinum toxin type A injection in the treatment of postparetic facial synkinesis: an integrative review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 101 (03) 284-293
5 Wei LA, Diels J, Lucarelli MJ. Treating buccinator with botulinum toxin in patients with facial synkinesis: a previously overlooked target. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 32 (02) 138-141
6 Husseman J, Mehta RP. Management of synkinesis. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (02) 242-249
7 Chuang DC, Chang TN, Lu JC. Postparalysis facial synkinesis: clinical classification and surgical strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (03) e320
8 Chuang DC, Chang TN, Lu JC, Zavala A. Surgical treatment for postparalytic facial synkinesis: a 35-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (03) 631-643
9 Derakhshan A, Miller MQ, Malka R, Gadkaree SK, Hadlock TA. Releasing the smile: depressor anguli oris excision in the context of managing nonflaccid facial palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (02) 261e-269e
10 Guerrissi JO. Selective myectomy for postparetic facial synkinesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87 (03) 459-466
11 Halani SH, Sanchez CV, Hembd AS, Mohanty AJ, Reisch J, Rozen SM. Depressor anguli oris myectomy versus transfer to depressor labii inferioris for facial symmetry in synkinetic facial paralysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (04) 328-334
12 Hembd AS, Sanchez CV, Halani SH, Mohanty AJ, Krag AE, Rozen SM. Do preoperative depressor anguli oris muscle blocks predict myectomy outcomes? A single-cohort comparison in postparetic facial synkinesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (01) 163-167
13 Jowett N, Malka R, Hadlock TA. Effect of weakening of ipsilateral depressor anguli oris on smile symmetry in postparalysis facial palsy. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (01) 29-33
14 Terzis JK, Karypidis D. Therapeutic strategies in post-facial paralysis synkinesis in adult patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (06) 925e-939e
15 Bassilios Habre S, Googe BJ, Depew JB, Wallace RD, Konofaos P. Depressor reanimation after facial nerve paralysis. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 82 (05) 582-590
16 Krag AE, Glick S, Hembd A, Rozen SM. The effect of depressor anguli oris muscle block on facial symmetry in synkinetic facial paralysis patients and its role in preoperative assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (03) 455-465
17 Rozen SM. Discussion: Surgical treatment for postparalytic facial synkinesis: a 35-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (03) 644-645
18 Azizzadeh B, Irvine LE, Diels J. et al. Modified selective neurectomy for the treatment of post–facial paralysis synkinesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (05) 1483-1496
19 Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012; 9 (07) 671-675
20 Guarin DL, Dusseldorp J, Hadlock TA, Jowett N. A machine learning approach for automated facial measurements in facial palsy. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (04) 335-337
21 VanSwearingen JM, Brach JS. The Facial Disability Index: reliability and validity of a disability assessment instrument for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system. Phys Ther 1996; 76 (12) 1288-1298 , discussion 1298–1300