Planta Med 1994; 60(1): 2-7
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-959396
REVIEW

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

From Ill-Defined Extracts to the Immunomodulatory Lectin: Will There be a Reason for Oncological Application of Mistletoe?*

Hans-J. Gabius1 , Sigrun Gabius1 , Shantaram S. Joshi2 , Bernhard Koch3 , Michael Schroeder3 , Walter M. Manzke3 , Martin Westerhausen3
  • 1Institut für Physiologische Chemie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Veterinärstr. 13, D-80539 München, Federal Republic of Germany
  • 2Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 600 South 42nd Str., Omaha, NE 68198-6395, U.S.A.
  • 3Medizinische Klinik II, St. Johannes Hospital, An der Abtei 7-11, D-47166 Duisburg, Federal Republic of Germany
* Dedicated to Prof. Dr. F. Cramer on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

1993

1993

Publikationsdatum:
04. Januar 2007 (online)

Abstract

There is an obvious discrepancy between the popularity of mistletoe extracts and their classification as a non-conventional treatment modality with unproven efficacy in oncology. The commercial preparations suffer from several major drawbacks: lack of precise declarations for the molecular characteristics and the concentrations of diverse extract constituents; the composition of extracts can even be influenced by the different methods of preparation, the time of harvest, and the type of host tree; lack of experimentally substantiated instructions for the dose of supposedly effective substance(s) and the schedule of applications to clinically trigger an un-disputably documented antitumoral activity; lack of thorough clinical studies according to the generally accepted criteria as the measure for responsible recommendations. To provide the indispensable set of data for a rational decision, the immunomodulatory galactoside-specific lectin was biochemically characterized and its antitumoral/antimetastatic activity was documented in three murine tumor model systems, occurring within a narrow dose range. Biweekly treatment with s.c. injections of a lectin dose of 1 ng/kg caused no notable harmful side-effects in patients, who showed modulation of selected immune parameters. In a group of 23 patients with advanced cancer no at least partial remission was seen. In principle, enhancement of factors like cytokine availability or NK-cell activity is not necessarily linked to therapeutic benefit. Factors such as growth promotion of certain tumor cell lines by cytokines, occurrence of respective insensitivity in advanced stages or varying levels of target sensitivity to cell-mediated cytotoxicity with significant interindividual differences deserve attention. Each tumor class has to be considered separately for its responsiveness. Similarly crucial for the decision of the focus of trials are valid suggestions for indicators to reliably recognize responders. Monitoring, for example, the presence of cytokine receptors or of MHC epitopes on tumor cells or the stimulation of the levels of acute-phase proteins in serum may be helpful. Taken together, this generally applicable course of research for a rigorously defined plant preparation or an isolated compound, culminating in the decisive clinical trials according to the approved criteria, will help answer the pertinent question on the oncological relevance of this treatment modality.

    >