Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1785665
Revisão Sistemática

Wrist Immobilization after Surgical Decompression of the Median Nerve in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
Thiago Moreth da Silva Barbosa 
1   Departamento de Ortopedista e Traumatologista, Hospital Getúlio Vargas, Recife, PE, Brasil
,
Ítalo Carvalho Ferraz
1   Departamento de Ortopedista e Traumatologista, Hospital Getúlio Vargas, Recife, PE, Brasil
› Author Affiliations Financial Support This study received no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The most common compressive neuropathy of the upper limbs is carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Historically, there has been a tendency to apply immobilization in the postoperative period, a practice that has decreased in recent years. This review aims to assess whether there is scientific evidence to justify the use of immobilization in the postoperative care of CTS decompression.

Methods The following databases were used: Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), PubMed National Library of Medicine – (NLM), Cochrane Library, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and EMBASE. The following inclusion criteria were used: 1) discussion of the postoperative period of median nerve decompression surgery in CTS; 2) comparison of results after surgical decompression in CTS between wrist immobilization or local dressing; 3) all languages, regardless of the year of publication; and 4) all types of publications. The following exclusion criteria were used: 1) studies that did not evaluate the postoperative period of CTS decompression; 2) lack of evaluation of the outcome related to the application of local dressing or some form of wrist immobilization after the surgical decompression procedure; and 3) repeated publications.

Results The literature search resulted in 336 relevant publications. In the end, 18 publications were chosen. Systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and cross-sectional studies were found.

Conclusions Due to the scarcity of evidence supporting the use of immobilization coupled with the higher costs associated with the practice, it has become less and less frequent in recent decades.

Clinical relevance In the literature, two approaches to postoperative care for CTS decompression are described: immobilization or just local dressing. According to the available scientific evidence, it is worth evaluating which one is better.

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome - median nerve - peripheral nerve injuries - wrist injuries

* Work carried out at the Getúlio Vargas Hospital, Recife, PE, Brazil.




Publication History

Received: 10 November 2023

Accepted: 15 January 2024

Article published online:
19 May 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

 

  • Referências

  • 1 Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2022
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Henry SL, Hubbard BA, Concannon MJ. Splinting after carpal tunnel release: current practice, scientific evidence, and trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (04) 1095
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Leinberry CF, Rivlin M, Maltenfort M. et al. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand: a 25-year perspective. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (10) 1997-2003.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Munns JJ, Awan HM. Trends in carpal tunnel surgery: an online survey of members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (04) 767-71.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bury TF, Akelman E, Weiss APC. Prospective, randomized trial of splinting after carpal tunnel release. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35 (01) 19-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med 2016; 21 (04) 125-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339 (04) b2700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ashworth NL. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Evid 2010; 2010: 1114
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Huisstede BM, Randsdorp MS, Coert JH, Glerum S, van Middelkoop M, Koes BW. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part II: effectiveness of surgical treatments–a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91 (07) 1005-1024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Peters S, Page MJ, Coppieters MW, Ross M, Johnston V. Rehabilitation following carpal tunnel release. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (06) CD004158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Peters S, Page MJ, Coppieters MW, Ross M, Johnston V. Rehabilitation following carpal tunnel release. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2 (02) CD004158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cook AC, Szabo RM, Birkholz SW, King EF. Early mobilization following carpal tunnel release. A prospective randomized study. J Hand Surg Br 1995; 20 (02) 228-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Finsen V, Andersen K, Russwurm H. No advantage from splinting the wrist after open carpal tunnel release. A randomized study of 82 wrists. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70 (03) 288-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Martins RS, Siqueira MG, Simplício H. Wrist immobilization after carpal tunnel release: a prospective study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006; 64 (3A): 596-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bhatia R, Field J, Grote J, Huma H. Does splintage help pain after carpal tunnel release?. J Hand Surg Br 2000; 25 (02) 150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Huemer GM, Koller M, Pachinger T, Dunst KM, Schwarz B, Hintringer T. Postoperative splinting after open carpal tunnel release does not improve functional and neurological outcome. Muscle Nerve 2007; 36 (04) 528-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cebesoy O, Kose KC, Kuru I, Altinel L, Gul R, Demirtas M. Use of a splint following open carpal tunnel release: a comparative study. Adv Ther 2007; 24 (03) 478-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tinhofer I, Draxler R, Koller R. Postoperative care and rehabilitation after open carpal tunnel surgery. Eur Surg 2013; 45 (05) 251-262
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Shalimar A, Nor-Hazla MH, Arifaizad A, Jamari S. Splinting after Carpal Tunnel Release: Does it really Matter?. Malays Orthop J 2015; 9 (02) 41-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Logli AL, Bear BJ, Schwartz EG, Korcek KJ, Foster BJ. A prospective, randomized trial of splinting after minicarpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (08) 775.e1-775.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zhang F, Jiang H, Lu Z. et al. The significance of wrist immobilization for endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Front Neurol 2023; 14: 1081440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar