Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2024; 45(02): 187-199
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778641
Review Article

Antibiotic Strategies for Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Matteo Bassetti
1   Infectious Diseases Unit, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
2   Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
,
Daniele R. Giacobbe
1   Infectious Diseases Unit, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
2   Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
,
Laura Magnasco
1   Infectious Diseases Unit, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
2   Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
,
Alberto Fantin
3   Department of Pulmonology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
,
Antonio Vena
1   Infectious Diseases Unit, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
2   Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
,
Nadia Castaldo
3   Department of Pulmonology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Despite advancements in health systems and intensive care unit (ICU) care, along with the introduction of novel antibiotics and microbiologic techniques, mortality rates in severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) patients have not shown significant improvement. Delayed admission to the ICU is a major risk factor for higher mortality. Apart from choosing the appropriate site of care, prompt and appropriate antibiotic therapy significantly affects the prognosis of sCAP. Treatment regimens involving ceftaroline or ceftobiprole are currently considered the best options for managing patients with sCAP. Additionally, several other molecules, such as delafloxacin, lefamulin, and omadacycline, hold promise as therapeutic strategies for sCAP. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the key challenges in managing adults with severe CAP, focusing on essential aspects related to antibiotic treatment and investigating potential strategies to enhance clinical outcomes in sCAP patients.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Niederman MS, McCombs JS, Unger AN, Kumar A, Popovian R. The cost of treating community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Ther 1998; 20 (04) 820-837
  • 2 Torres A, Chalmers JD, Dela Cruz CS. et al. Challenges in severe community-acquired pneumonia: a point-of-view review. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45 (02) 159-171
  • 3 Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A. et al; Infectious Diseases Society of America, American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44 (Suppl 2, Suppl 2): S27-S72
  • 4 Cavallazzi R, Furmanek S, Arnold FW. et al. The burden of community-acquired pneumonia requiring admission to ICU in the United States. Chest 2020; 158 (03) 1008-1016
  • 5 Martin-Loeches I, Torres A, Nagavci B. et al. ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2023; 61 (04) 2200735
  • 6 Restrepo MI, Mortensen EM, Rello J, Brody J, Anzueto A. Late admission to the ICU in patients with community-acquired pneumonia is associated with higher mortality. Chest 2010; 137 (03) 552-557
  • 7 Pereira JM, Gonçalves-Pereira J, Ribeiro O, Baptista JP, Froes F, Paiva JA. Impact of antibiotic therapy in severe community-acquired pneumonia: data from the INFAUCI study. J Crit Care 2018; 43: 183-189
  • 8 Chalmers JD, Mandal P, Singanayagam A. et al. Severity assessment tools to guide ICU admission in community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37 (09) 1409-1420
  • 9 Kolditz M, Ewig S, Klapdor B. et al; CAPNETZ study group. Community-acquired pneumonia as medical emergency: predictors of early deterioration. Thorax 2015; 70 (06) 551-558
  • 10 Massarrat S, Herbert V, Veith R. Effect of low dose of cimetidine on gastric potentials difference and acetylsalicylic acid-induced change. Klin Wochenschr 1981; 59 (16) 911-912
  • 11 Charles PG, Wolfe R, Whitby M. et al; Australian Community-Acquired Pneumonia Study Collaboration. SMART-COP: a tool for predicting the need for intensive respiratory or vasopressor support in community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47 (03) 375-384
  • 12 Rello J, Rodriguez A, Lisboa T, Gallego M, Lujan M, Wunderink R. PIRO score for community-acquired pneumonia: a new prediction rule for assessment of severity in intensive care unit patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2009; 37 (02) 456-462
  • 13 Jones M. NEWSDIG: the National Early Warning Score development and implementation group. Clin Med (Lond) 2012; 12 (06) 501-503
  • 14 Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, Mody SH, Kollef MH. Antimicrobial therapy escalation and hospital mortality among patients with health-care-associated pneumonia: a single-center experience. Chest 2008; 134 (05) 963-968
  • 15 McCabe C, Kirchner C, Zhang H, Daley J, Fisman DN. Guideline-concordant therapy and reduced mortality and length of stay in adults with community-acquired pneumonia: playing by the rules. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169 (16) 1525-1531
  • 16 Garcia-Vidal C, Carratalà J. Early and late treatment failure in community-acquired pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 30 (02) 154-160
  • 17 Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200 (07) e45-e67
  • 18 Arulkumaran N, Khpal M, Tam K, Baheerathan A, Corredor C, Singer M. Effect of antibiotic discontinuation strategies on mortality and infectious complications in critically ill septic patients: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Crit Care Med 2020; 48 (05) 757-764
  • 19 Nobre V, Harbarth S, Graf JD, Rohner P, Pugin J. Use of procalcitonin to shorten antibiotic treatment duration in septic patients: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177 (05) 498-505
  • 20 Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F. et al; PRORATA trial group. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients' exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375 (9713) 463-474
  • 21 de Jong E, van Oers JA, Beishuizen A. et al. Efficacy and safety of procalcitonin guidance in reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: a randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16 (07) 819-827
  • 22 Torres A, Sibila O, Ferrer M. et al. Effect of corticosteroids on treatment failure among hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high inflammatory response: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 313 (07) 677-686
  • 23 Stern A, Skalsky K, Avni T, Carrara E, Leibovici L, Paul M. Corticosteroids for pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 12 (12) CD007720
  • 24 Briel M, Spoorenberg SMC, Snijders D. et al; Ovidius Study Group, Capisce Study Group, STEP Study Group. Corticosteroids in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and individual patient data metaanalysis. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66 (03) 346-354
  • 25 Dequin PF, Meziani F, Quenot JP. et al; CRICS-TriGGERSep Network. Hydrocortisone in severe community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2023; 388 (21) 1931-1941
  • 26 Confalonieri M, Urbino R, Potena A. et al. Hydrocortisone infusion for severe community-acquired pneumonia: a preliminary randomized study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171 (03) 242-248
  • 27 Wiemken T, Peyrani P, Bryant K. et al. Incidence of respiratory viruses in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit: results from the severe influenza pneumonia surveillance (SIPS) project. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 32 (05) 705-710
  • 28 Morgan AJ, Glossop AJ. Severe community-acquired pneumonia. BJA Educ 2016; 16 (05) 167-172
  • 29 Falguera M, Carratalà J, Ruiz-Gonzalez A. et al. Risk factors and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli. Respirology 2009; 14 (01) 105-111
  • 30 Gramegna A, Sotgiu G, Di Pasquale M. et al; GLIMP Study Group. Atypical pathogens in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a worldwide perspective. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18 (01) 677
  • 31 Ferrer M, Travierso C, Cilloniz C. et al. Severe community-acquired pneumonia: Characteristics and prognostic factors in ventilated and non-ventilated patients. PLoS One 2018; 13 (01) e0191721
  • 32 Jain S, Self WH, Wunderink RG. et al; CDC EPIC Study Team. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 2015; 373 (05) 415-427
  • 33 Cillóniz C, Ewig S, Polverino E. et al. Microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia and its relation to severity. Thorax 2011; 66 (04) 340-346
  • 34 Rouzé A, Martin-Loeches I, Povoa P. et al; coVAPid study Group. Relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the incidence of ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections: a European multicenter cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47 (02) 188-198
  • 35 Bassetti M, Peghin M, Gallo T. et al. The burden of severe cases of Influenza disease: the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region experience. J Prev Med Hyg 2019; 60 (03) E163-E170
  • 36 Aliberti S, Cilloniz C, Chalmers JD. et al. Multidrug-resistant pathogens in hospitalised patients coming from the community with pneumonia: a European perspective. Thorax 2013; 68 (11) 997-999
  • 37 Aliberti S, Reyes LF, Faverio P. et al; GLIMP investigators. Global initiative for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia (GLIMP): an international, observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16 (12) 1364-1376
  • 38 Cillóniz C, Dominedò C, Nicolini A, Torres A. PES pathogens in severe community-acquired pneumonia. Microorganisms 2019; 7 (02) 49
  • 39 Restrepo MI, Babu BL, Reyes LF. et al; GLIMP. Burden and risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa community-acquired pneumonia: a multinational point prevalence study of hospitalised patients. Eur Respir J 2018; 52 (02) 1701190
  • 40 Villafuerte D, Aliberti S, Soni NJ. et al; GLIMP Investigators. Prevalence and risk factors for Enterobacteriaceae in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Respirology 2020; 25 (05) 543-551
  • 41 Musher DM, Abers MS, Bartlett JG. Evolving understanding of the causes of pneumonia in adults, with special attention to the role of pneumococcus. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65 (10) 1736-1744
  • 42 Wongsurakiat P, Chitwarakorn N. Severe community-acquired pneumonia in general medical wards: outcomes and impact of initial antibiotic selection. BMC Pulm Med 2019; 19 (01) 179
  • 43 Musher DM, Roig IL, Cazares G, Stager CE, Logan N, Safar H. Can an etiologic agent be identified in adults who are hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia: results of a one-year study. J Infect 2013; 67 (01) 11-18
  • 44 Gadsby NJ, Russell CD, McHugh MP. et al. Comprehensive molecular testing for respiratory pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62 (07) 817-823
  • 45 Murphy CN, Fowler R, Balada-Llasat JM. et al. Multicenter evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray pneumonia/pneumonia plus panel for detection and quantification of agents of lower respiratory tract infection. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58 (07) e00128-20
  • 46 Vincent JL, Brealey D, Libert N. et al; Rapid Diagnosis of Infections in the Critically Ill Team. Rapid diagnosis of infection in the critically ill, a multicenter study of molecular detection in bloodstream infections, pneumonia, and sterile site infections. Crit Care Med 2015; 43 (11) 2283-2291
  • 47 Prina E, Ranzani OT, Polverino E. et al. Risk factors associated with potentially antibiotic-resistant pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12 (02) 153-160
  • 48 Falcone M, Russo A, Giannella M. et al. Individualizing risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens in community-onset pneumonia. PLoS One 2015; 10 (04) e0119528
  • 49 Webb BJ, Jones B, Dean NC. Empiric antibiotic selection and risk prediction of drug-resistant pathogens in community-onset pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2016; 29 (02) 167-177
  • 50 Wang PH, Wang HC, Cheng SL, Chang HT, Laio CH. Selection of empirical antibiotics for health care-associated pneumonia via integration of pneumonia severity index and risk factors of drug-resistant pathogens. J Formos Med Assoc 2016; 115 (05) 356-363
  • 51 Shorr AF, Zilberberg MD, Reichley R. et al. Validation of a clinical score for assessing the risk of resistant pathogens in patients with pneumonia presenting to the emergency department. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54 (02) 193-198
  • 52 Aliberti S, Di Pasquale M, Zanaboni AM. et al. Stratifying risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens in hospitalized patients coming from the community with pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54 (04) 470-478
  • 53 Wu CL, Ku SC, Yang KY. et al. Antimicrobial drug-resistant microbes associated with hospitalized community-acquired and healthcare-associated pneumonia: a multi-center study in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2013; 112 (01) 31-40
  • 54 American Thoracic Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171 (04) 388-416
  • 55 Shorr AF, Bodi M, Rodriguez A, Sole-Violan J, Garnacho-Montero J, Rello J. CAPUCI Study Investigators. Impact of antibiotic guideline compliance on duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2006; 130 (01) 93-100
  • 56 Menéndez R, Torres A, Reyes S. et al. Initial management of pneumonia and sepsis: factors associated with improved outcome. Eur Respir J 2012; 39 (01) 156-162
  • 57 Sligl WI, Asadi L, Eurich DT, Tjosvold L, Marrie TJ, Majumdar SR. Macrolides and mortality in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2014; 42 (02) 420-432
  • 58 Weiss K, Tillotson GS. The controversy of combination vs monotherapy in the treatment of hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2005; 128 (02) 940-946
  • 59 Baddour LM, Yu VL, Klugman KP. et al; International Pneumococcal Study Group. Combination antibiotic therapy lowers mortality among severely ill patients with pneumococcal bacteremia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 170 (04) 440-444
  • 60 Ceccato A, Cilloniz C, Martin-Loeches I. et al. Effect of combined β-lactam/macrolide therapy on mortality according to the microbial etiology and inflammatory status of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2019; 155 (04) 795-804
  • 61 Lodise TP, Kwa A, Cosler L, Gupta R, Smith RP. Comparison of beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy versus fluoroquinolone monotherapy in hospitalized Veterans Affairs patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51 (11) 3977-3982
  • 62 Metersky ML, Ma A, Houck PM, Bratzler DW. Antibiotics for bacteremic pneumonia: Improved outcomes with macrolides but not fluoroquinolones. Chest 2007; 131 (02) 466-473
  • 63 De la Calle C, Ternavasio-de la Vega HG, Morata L. et al. Effectiveness of combination therapy versus monotherapy with a third-generation cephalosporin in bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia: a propensity score analysis. J Infect 2018; 76 (04) 342-347
  • 64 Anderson R, Steel HC, Cockeran R. et al. Clarithromycin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone inhibits the production of pneumolysin by both macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae . J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 59 (02) 224-229
  • 65 Vardakas KZ, Trigkidis KK, Falagas ME. Fluoroquinolones or macrolides in combination with β-lactams in adult patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017; 23 (04) 234-241
  • 66 Martin-Loeches I, Lisboa T, Rodriguez A. et al. Combination antibiotic therapy with macrolides improves survival in intubated patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36 (04) 612-620
  • 67 Yu VL, Greenberg RN, Zadeikis N. et al. Levofloxacin efficacy in the treatment of community-acquired legionellosis. Chest 2004; 125 (06) 2135-2139
  • 68 Mykietiuk A, Carratalà J, Fernández-Sabé N. et al. Clinical outcomes for hospitalized patients with Legionella pneumonia in the antigenuria era: the influence of levofloxacin therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40 (06) 794-799
  • 69 Blázquez Garrido RM, Espinosa Parra FJ, Alemany Francés L. et al. Antimicrobial chemotherapy for Legionnaires disease: levofloxacin versus macrolides. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40 (06) 800-806
  • 70 Burdet C, Lepeule R, Duval X. et al. Quinolones versus macrolides in the treatment of legionellosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69 (09) 2354-2360
  • 71 Sabrià M, Pedro-Botet ML, Gómez J. et al; Legionnaires Disease Therapy Group. Fluoroquinolones vs macrolides in the treatment of Legionnaires disease. Chest 2005; 128 (03) 1401-1405
  • 72 Cecchini J, Tuffet S, Sonneville R. et al. Antimicrobial strategy for severe community-acquired legionnaires' disease: a multicentre retrospective observational study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017; 72 (05) 1502-1509
  • 73 Slawek D, Altshuler D, Dubrovskaya Y, Louie E. Tigecycline as a second-line agent for Legionnaires' disease in severely ill patients. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017; 4 (04) ofx184
  • 74 Arget M, Kosar J, Suen B, Peermohamed S. Successful treatment of legionnaires' disease with tigecycline in an immunocompromised man with a Legion of antibiotic allergies. Cureus 2019; 11 (04) e4577
  • 75 Cruciani M, Gatti G, Lazzarini L. et al. Penetration of vancomycin into human lung tissue. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996; 38 (05) 865-869
  • 76 Ye ZK, Li C, Zhai SD. Guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: a systematic review. PLoS One 2014; 9 (06) e99044
  • 77 Bassetti M, Labate L, Melchio M. et al. Current pharmacotherapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23 (03) 361-375
  • 78 Sicot N, Khanafer N, Meyssonnier V. et al. Methicillin resistance is not a predictor of severity in community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus necrotizing pneumonia–results of a prospective observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19 (03) E142-E148
  • 79 Micek ST, Dunne M, Kollef MH. Pleuropulmonary complications of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: importance of treatment with antimicrobials inhibiting exotoxin production. Chest 2005; 128 (04) 2732-2738
  • 80 Frank AL, Marcinak JF, Mangat PD. et al. Clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002; 21 (06) 530-534
  • 81 Nguyen HM, Graber CJ. Limitations of antibiotic options for invasive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: is combination therapy the answer?. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65 (01) 24-36
  • 82 Adhikari RP, Shrestha S, Barakoti A, Amatya R. Inducible clindamycin and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17 (01) 483
  • 83 Seifi N, Kahani N, Askari E, Mahdipour S, Naderi NM. Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from Mashhad, Iran. Iran J Microbiol 2012; 4 (02) 82-86
  • 84 Honeybourne D, Tobin C, Jevons G, Andrews J, Wise R. Intrapulmonary penetration of linezolid. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 51 (06) 1431-1434
  • 85 San Pedro GS, Cammarata SK, Oliphant TH, Todisco T. Linezolid Community-Acquired Pneumonia Study Group. Linezolid versus ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime in patients hospitalized for the treatment of Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia. Scand J Infect Dis 2002; 34 (10) 720-728
  • 86 Kato H, Hagihara M, Asai N. et al. Meta-analysis of vancomycin versus linezolid in pneumonia with proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2021; 24: 98-105
  • 87 Steed ME, Rybak MJ. Ceftaroline: a new cephalosporin with activity against resistant gram-positive pathogens. Pharmacotherapy 2010; 30 (04) 375-389
  • 88 Jorgenson MR, DePestel DD, Carver PL. Ceftaroline fosamil: a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Pharmacother 2011; 45 (11) 1384-1398
  • 89 Bae IG, Stone GG. Activity of ceftaroline against pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia collected as part of the AWARE surveillance program, 2015-2016. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 95 (03) 114843
  • 90 Riccobene TA, Pushkin R, Jandourek A, Knebel W, Khariton T. Penetration of ceftaroline into the epithelial lining fluid of healthy adult subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016; 60 (10) 5849-5857
  • 91 MacVane SH, So W, Nicolau DP, Kuti JL. In vitro activity of human-simulated epithelial lining fluid exposures of ceftaroline, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58 (12) 7520-7526
  • 92 FDA. TEFLARO (ceftaroline fosamil) for injection, for intravenous use. Accessed November 22, 2023 at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/200327s015lbl.pdf
  • 93 File Jr TM, Low DE, Eckburg PB. et al; FOCUS 1 investigators. FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 (Suppl. 03) iii19-iii32
  • 94 Low DE, File Jr TM, Eckburg PB. et al; FOCUS 2 investigators. FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66 (Suppl. 03) iii33-iii44
  • 95 File Jr TM, Low DE, Eckburg PB. et al. Integrated analysis of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2: randomized, doubled-blinded, multicenter phase 3 trials of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51 (12) 1395-1405
  • 96 Zhong NS, Sun T, Zhuo C. et al. Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of Asian patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority with nested superiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15 (02) 161-171
  • 97 Jandourek AUG, Smith A, Friedland HD. CAPTURE study experience in patients with community acquired pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and treatment with ceftaroline presented at: ECCMID;. Oakland, USA:: Corpus Christi;; 2013
  • 98 Bassetti M, Russo A, Cilloniz C. et al. Ceftaroline for severe community-acquired pneumonia: a real-world two-centre experience in Italy and Spain. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020; 55 (04) 105921
  • 99 Eljaaly K, Wali H, Basilim A, Alharbi A, Asfour HZ. Clinical cure with ceftriaxone versus ceftaroline or ceftobiprole in the treatment of staphylococcal pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2019; 54 (02) 149-153
  • 100 Torres A, Bassetti M, Welte T. et al. Economic analysis of ceftaroline fosamil for treating community-acquired pneumonia in Spain. J Med Econ 2020; 23 (02) 148-155
  • 101 Liapikou A, Cilloniz C, Palomeque A, Torres T. Emerging antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2019; 24 (04) 221-231
  • 102 Giacobbe DR, De Rosa FG, Del Bono V. et al. Ceftobiprole: drug evaluation and place in therapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2019; 17 (09) 689-698
  • 103 Fritsche TR, Sader HS, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole, a novel anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cephalosporin, tested against contemporary pathogens: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2005-2006). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 61 (01) 86-95
  • 104 Torres A, Mouton JW, Pea F. Pharmacokinetics and dosing of ceftobiprole medocaril for the treatment of hospital- and community-acquired pneumonia in different patient populations. Clin Pharmacokinet 2016; 55 (12) 1507-1520
  • 105 Nicholson SC, Welte T, File Jr TM. et al. A randomised, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with ceftriaxone with or without linezolid for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2012; 39 (03) 240-246
  • 106 Scheeren TWL, Welte T, Saulay M, Engelhardt M, Santerre-Henriksen A, Hamed K. Early improvement in severely ill patients with pneumonia treated with ceftobiprole: a retrospective analysis of two major trials. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19 (01) 195
  • 107 Walden AP, Clarke GM, McKechnie S. et al; ESICM/ECCRN GenOSept Investigators. Patients with community acquired pneumonia admitted to European intensive care units: an epidemiological survey of the GenOSept cohort. Crit Care 2014; 18 (02) R58
  • 108 Zhanel GG, Hartel E, Adam H. et al. Solithromycin: a novel fluoroketolide for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Drugs 2016; 76 (18) 1737-1757
  • 109 Rodgers W, Frazier AD, Champney WS. Solithromycin inhibition of protein synthesis and ribosome biogenesis in Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57 (04) 1632-1637
  • 110 Barrera CM, Mykietiuk A, Metev H. et al; SOLITAIRE-ORAL Pneumonia Team. Efficacy and safety of oral solithromycin versus oral moxifloxacin for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: a global, double-blind, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial (SOLITAIRE-ORAL). Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16 (04) 421-430
  • 111 File Jr TM, Rewerska B, Vucinic-Mihailovic V. et al. SOLITAIRE-IV: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous-to-oral solithromycin to intravenous-to-oral moxifloxacin for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63 (08) 1007-1016
  • 112 Compra I. Cempra receives complete response letter for solithromycin NDAs. 2016 . Accessed November 22, 2023 at: http://investor.cempra.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=1005708
  • 113 Mogle BT, Steele JM, Thomas SJ, Bohan KH, Kufel WD. Clinical review of delafloxacin: a novel anionic fluoroquinolone. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 73 (06) 1439-1451
  • 114 McCurdy S, Keedy K, Lawrence L. et al. Efficacy of delafloxacin versus moxifloxacin against bacterial respiratory pathogens in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): microbiology results from the delafloxacin phase 3 CABP trial. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64 (03) e01949-19
  • 115 Pfaller MA, Sader HS, Rhomberg PR, Flamm RK. In vitro activity of delafloxacin against contemporary bacterial pathogens from the United States and Europe, 2014. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61 (04) e02609-16
  • 116 Thabit AK, Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiling of delafloxacin in a murine lung model against community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2016; 48 (05) 535-541
  • 117 Agency EM. . Quofenix, INN-delafloxacin. 2019 . Accessed at January 7, 2024 at https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/quofenix
  • 118 FDA. BAXDELA (delafloxacin) Label. . Accessed November 22, 2023 at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/208610s000%2C208611s000lbl.pdf
  • 119 Sharma R, Sandrock CE, Meehan J, Theriault N. Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia-changing epidemiology, resistance patterns, and newer antibiotics: spotlight on delafloxacin. Clin Drug Investig 2020; 40 (10) 947-960
  • 120 Li ZX, Liu YN, Wang R, Li AM. Nemonoxacin has potent activity against gram-positive, but not gram-negative clinical isolates. Clin Ter 2015; 166 (06) e374-e380
  • 121 Qin X, Huang H. Review of nemonoxacin with special focus on clinical development. Drug Des Devel Ther 2014; 8: 765-774
  • 122 Huang CH, Lai CC, Chen YH, Hsueh PR. The potential role of nemonoxacin for treatment of common infections. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015; 16 (02) 263-270
  • 123 TaiGen. TaiGen received marketing approval from TFDA for Taigexyn® IV formulation in Taiwan. 2020 . Accessed at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/
  • 124 Chavan R, Zope V, Chavan N. et al. Assessment of in vitro inhibitory effects of novel anti MRSA benzoquinolizine fluoroquinolone WCK 771 (levonadifloxacin) and its metabolite on human liver cytochrome P450 enzymes. Xenobiotica 2020; 50 (10) 1149-1157
  • 125 Karpiuk I, Tyski S. Looking for the new preparations for antibacterial therapy III. New antimicrobial agents from the quinolones group in clinical trials. Przegl Epidemiol 2013; 67 (03) 455-460 , 557–561
  • 126 Chang SP, Lee HZ, Lai CC, Tang HJ. The efficacy and safety of nemonoxacin compared with levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Infect Drug Resist 2019; 12: 433-438
  • 127 Honeyman L, Ismail M, Nelson ML. et al. Structure-activity relationship of the aminomethylcyclines and the discovery of omadacycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59 (11) 7044-7053
  • 128 Draper MP, Weir S, Macone A. et al. Mechanism of action of the novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic omadacycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58 (03) 1279-1283
  • 129 Pfaller MA, Huband MD, Shortridge D, Flamm RK. Surveillance of omadacycline activity tested against clinical isolates from the United States and Europe: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2016 to 2018. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64 (05) e02488-19
  • 130 Pfaller MA, Rhomberg PR, Huband MD, Flamm RK. Activities of omadacycline and comparator agents against Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a surveillance program conducted in North America and Europe. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61 (03) e02411-16
  • 131 Gotfried MH, Horn K, Garrity-Ryan L. et al. Comparison of omadacycline and tigecycline pharmacokinetics in the plasma, epithelial lining fluid, and alveolar cells of healthy adult subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61 (09) e01135-17
  • 132 Flarakos J, Du Y, Gu H. et al. Clinical disposition, metabolism and in vitro drug-drug interaction properties of omadacycline. Xenobiotica 2017; 47 (08) 682-696
  • 133 FDA. NUZYRA (omadacycline). 2018 . Accessed at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/209816_209817lbl.pdf
  • 134 Torres A, Garrity-Ryan L, Kirsch C. et al. Omadacycline vs moxifloxacin in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 104: 501-509
  • 135 Sader HS, Paukner S, Ivezic-Schoenfeld Z, Biedenbach DJ, Schmitz FJ, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of the novel pleuromutilin antibiotic BC-3781 against organisms responsible for community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CARTIs). J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67 (05) 1170-1175
  • 136 Veve MP, Wagner JL. Lefamulin: review of a promising novel pleuromutilin antibiotic. Pharmacotherapy 2018; 38 (09) 935-946
  • 137 Mercuro NJ, Veve MP. Clinical utility of lefamulin: if not now, when?. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2020; 22 (09) 25
  • 138 Xenleta FDA. Lefamulin, highlights of prescribing information. 2019 . Accessed at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/211672s000%2C211673s000lbl.pdf
  • 139 File TM, Goldberg L, Das A. et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous-to-oral lefamulin, a pleuromutilin antibiotic, for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: the phase III Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP 1) trial. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 69 (11) 1856-1867
  • 140 Alexander E, Goldberg L, Das AF. et al. Oral lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for early clinical response among adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: the LEAP 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 322 (17) 1661-1671
  • 141 Kwon AR, Min YH, Ryu JM, Choi DR, Shim MJ, Choi EC. In vitro and in vivo activities of DW-224a, a novel fluoroquinolone antibiotic agent. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58 (03) 684-688
  • 142 Covington PS, Davenport JM, Andrae DA. et al. A phase 2 study of the novel fluoroquinolone JNJ-Q2 in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013; 68 (11) 2691-2693
  • 143 Flamm RK, Farrell DJ, Rhomberg PR, Scangarella-Oman NE, Sader HS. Gepotidacin (GSK2140944) in vitro activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61 (07) e00468-17
  • 144 Jacobs MR, Bajaksouzian S, Windau A. et al. In vitro activity of the new quinolone WCK 771 against staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48 (09) 3338-3342
  • 145 Rhee CK, Chang JH, Choi EG. et al. Zabofloxacin versus moxifloxacin in patients with COPD exacerbation: a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, phase III, non-inferiority trial. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2015; 10: 2265-2275
  • 146 Grossman TH, Fyfe C, O'Brien W. et al. Fluorocycline TP-271 is potent against complicated community-acquired bacterial pneumonia pathogens. MSphere 2017; 2 (01) e00004-17
  • 147 Liapikou A, Cillóniz C, Torres A. Investigational drugs in phase I and phase II clinical trials for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2017; 26 (11) 1239-1248
  • 148 Lemaire S, Kosowska-Shick K, Appelbaum PC, Verween G, Tulkens PM, Van Bambeke F. Cellular pharmacodynamics of the novel biaryloxazolidinone radezolid: studies with infected phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells, using Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Listeria monocytogenes, and Legionella pneumophila . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54 (06) 2549-2559
  • 149 Carvalhaes CG, Duncan LR, Wang W, Sader HS. In vitro activity and potency of the novel oxazolidinone contezolid (MRX-I) tested against gram-positive clinical isolates from the United States and Europe. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64 (11) e01195-20