Am J Perinatol 2018; 35(13): 1297-1302
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1649482
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Association between Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight and the Risk of Cesarean Delivery among Nulliparous Women with Diabetes in Pregnancy

Annie M. Dude
1   Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
William A. Grobman
1   Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Lynn M. Yee
1   Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
Funding L.M.Y. is supported by NICHD K12 HD050121-11. Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number UL1TR001422. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

12. September 2017

28. März 2018

Publikationsdatum:
04. Mai 2018 (online)

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to examine the association between an ultrasound-estimated fetal weight (US-EFW) and mode of delivery among nulliparous diabetic women.

Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women with medication-requiring gestational or pregestational diabetes who delivered term, singleton gestations following a trial of labor. We determined whether having had an US-EFW within 35 days of delivery was associated with cesarean delivery.

Results Of 304 women who met the eligibility criteria, 231 (76.0%) had an US-EFW within 35 days of delivery. An US-EFW was associated with increased likelihood of intrapartum cesarean (51.5% for those with an ultrasound vs. 27.4% for those without, p < 0.001); this finding persisted even when controlling for birth weight and other confounding factors (adjusted odds ratio: 2.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.16–4.28). Among women with a recent US-EFW, a diagnosis of a large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetus was associated with overall intrapartum cesarean frequency (65.2% for women with an LGA fetus vs. 46.1% for those without, p = 0.009), but this association did not remain significant in multivariable models.

Conclusion An US-EFW within 35 days of delivery among nulliparous women with medication-requiring diabetes was positively associated with intrapartum cesarean delivery.

Note

A version of this article was presented at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Annual Meeting, January 2017, Las Vegas, NV.


 
  • References

  • 1 Siddique J, Lauderdale DS, VanderWeele TJ, Lantos JD. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006. Med Care 2009; 47 (11) 1129-1135
  • 2 Yee LM, Grobman WA. Relationship between third-trimester sonographic estimate of fetal weight and mode of delivery. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35 (04) 701-706
  • 3 Little SE, Edlow AG, Thomas AM, Smith NA. Estimated fetal weight by ultrasound: a modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207 (04) 309.e1-309.e6
  • 4 Blackwell SC, Refuerzo J, Chadha R, Carreno CA. Overestimation of fetal weight by ultrasound: does it influence the likelihood of cesarean delivery for labor arrest?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200 (03) 1-3
  • 5 Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Ben-Haroush A. Sonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia: the consequences of false diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29 (02) 225-230
  • 6 Matthews KC, Williamson J, Gupta S. , et al. The effect of a sonographic estimated fetal weight on the risk of cesarean delivery in macrosomic and small for gestational-age infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30 (10) 1172-1176
  • 7 Scifres CM, Feghali M, Dumont T. , et al. Large-for-gestational-age ultrasound diagnosis and risk for cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (05) 978-986
  • 8 Parry S, Severs CP, Sehdev HM, Macones GA, White LM, Morgan MA. Ultrasonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia. Association with cesarean delivery. J Reprod Med 2000; 45 (01) 17-22
  • 9 Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (03) 179-193
  • 10 Hamilton BE, Hoyert DL, Martin JA, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010-2011. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (03) 548-558
  • 11 Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM, Catalano PM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (03) 964-968
  • 12 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 175: ultrasound in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (06) e241-e256
  • 13 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 137: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (2 Pt 1): 406-416
  • 14 Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144 (07) 768-773
  • 15 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 60, March 2005. Pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (03) 675-685
  • 16 Nelson L, Wharton B, Grobman WA. Prediction of large for gestational age birth weights in diabetic mothers based on early third-trimester sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30 (12) 1625-1628
  • 17 Best G, Pressman EK. Ultrasonographic prediction of birth weight in diabetic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99 (5 Pt 1): 740-744
  • 18 Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology 1991; 181 (01) 129-133
  • 19 Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman MW. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr 2003; 3: 6
  • 20 Froehlich RJ, Sandoval G, Bailit JL. , et al; MSCE, for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Association of recorded estimated fetal weight and cesarean delivery in attempted vaginal delivery at term. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (03) 487-494
  • 21 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 173: fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (05) e195-e209
  • 22 Yee LM, Liu LY, Grobman WA. The relationship between obstetricians' cognitive and affective traits and their patients' delivery outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (06) 692.e1-692.e6
  • 23 Valent AM, Newman T, Kritzer S, Magner K, Warshak CR. Accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight near delivery in pregnancies complicated with diabetes mellitus. J Ultrasound Med 2017; 36 (03) 593-599