J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(S 01): S1-S188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633728
Poster Presentations
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Coblator Use in Endonasal and Transcranial Neurosurgical Procedures

Shahed Tish
1   Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
,
Ghaith Habboub
1   Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
,
Varun Kshettry
1   Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
,
Troy Woodard
1   Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
,
Pablo Recinos
1   Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 February 2018 (online)

 

Background Skull base lesions are notorious for their access difficulty, thus there is a continuous need to develop and use new tools. The coblation (controlled ablation) is designed for ablation, resection, coagulation of soft tissue, and hemostasis of blood vessels. It is mostly used in otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery. Other neurosurgical uses were described in sciatic and femoral nerves ablation in phantom limb pain. It is also used in transnasal encephalocele repair as it offers shorter period of resection when compared with bipolar use.

Coblator uses pulsed electrical current through a medium (normal saline or lactated Ringer) which creates excited highly energetic sodium, hydroxyl, and hydrogen radicals. The plasma layer is localized around the electrodes. This causes tissue destruction through the interactions of the above ions with the surrounding tissue. The effect is purely chemical and not thermal. The Coblator does not produce high temperature (40–70°C) as opposed to other thermal coagulation tools (400–600°C). The benefit of using the Coblator is causing less thermal injury to the surrounding tissue comparing to other methods.

There are two settings in the Coblator: the coblation and the coagulation modes. When coblation setting increases, the thermal effect decreases.

Here, we describe our experiences with the use of Coblator for intracranial surgeries.

Table 1 List of patients for whom the Coblator was used

Patient no.

Pathology

Type of surgery

Indication for usage

Patient history

1

Convexity/parasagittal hemangiopericytoma

Craniotomy

Highly vascular tumor

45-y-old woman who presents with right-sided weakness and imaging showing very large extra-axial mass

2

Encephalocele

Endonasal

To shrink encephalocele

48-y-old woman who presents with CSF rhinorrhea and imaging showing ethmoidal meningoencephalocele

3

Encephalocele

Endonasal

To shrink encephalocele

68-y-old woman who presents with CSF rhinorrhea and imaging showing left lateral sphenoid meningoencephalocele

4

Nasal/anterior skull base tumor, teratocarcinosarcoma

Endonasal

Vascular tumor

65-y-old man who presents with feeling of fullness and imaging showing nasal cavity/cribriform mass

Discussion Our indications for the cases mostly fall under two categories:

  1. Highly vascular tumor (either transcranial or endonasal)

  2. Encephalocele repair.

The use of Coblator in encephalocele repair helps shrink the herniated brain while minimizing thermal injury to the surrounding normal brain. The advantage of using the Coblator in vascular tumor is the combination of ablation and coagulation.

While the clear benefits of the Coblator are noticeable, we have to be cautious regarding its injury to the surrounding tissue. There is more fibrosis in the mucosal cavity compared with the other coaglulative tools. We observed some periencephalocele edema postoperatively.

Conclusion This is the first study to describe the use of the Coblator in transcranial cases. More work has to be done to assure the safety of the Coblator when used in direct contact with the brain.