Download PDF
Semin Thromb Hemost 2008; 34(4): 373-379
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1085480
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Laboratory Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants: Diagnostic Criteria and Use of Screening, Mixing, and Confirmatory Studies

Armando Tripodi1
  • 1Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University and IRCCS Maggiore Hospital, Mangiagalli and Regina Elena Foundation, Milan, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2008 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The presence of lupus anticoagulants (LA) in plasma is a strong risk factor for thromboembolism and fetal loss. Because of this, demand for testing for LA is increasing, but the performance of clinical laboratories in terms of its detection is still a matter of concern. This is due in part to the lack of specific tests but also to the lack of standardization and application of the diagnostic criteria. The aim of this article is to review the diagnostic criteria and the many issues that may affect test results.

KEYWORDS

Thrombophilia testing - antiphospholipid syndrome - thrombosis - fetal loss

REFERENCES

  • 1 Brandt J T, Triplett D A, Alving B, Scharrer I. Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the ISTH.  Thromb Haemost. 1995;  74 1185-1190
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Roussi J, Roisin J P, Goguel A. Lupus anticoagulants. First French interlaboratory Etalonorm survey.  Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;  105 788-793
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Arnout J. Antiphospholipid syndrome: diagnostic aspects of lupus anticoagulants.  Thromb Haemost. 2001;  86 83-91
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Favaloro E J, Bonar R, Sioufi J et al.. Multilaboratory testing of thrombophilia: current and past practice in Australasia as assessed through the Royal College of Pathologists of the Australasia Quality Assurance Programs for Hematology.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 2005;  31 49-58
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Favaloro E J, Bonar R, Duncan E et al.. (on behalf of the RCPA QAP in Haematology Haemostasis Committee). Identification of factor inhibitors by diagnostic haemostasis laboratories: a large multicenter evaluation.  Thromb Haemost. 2006;  96 73-78
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jennings I, Kitchen S, Woods T A, Preston F E, Greaves M. Potentially clinically important inaccuracies in testing for the lupus anticoagulant: an analysis of results from three surveys of the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for Blood Coagulation.  Thromb Haemost. 1997;  77 934-937
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Arnout J, Meijer P, Vermylen J. Lupus anticoagulant testing in Europe: an analysis of results from the first European Concerted Action on Thrombophilia (ECAT) survey using plasmas spiked with monoclonal antibodies against human beta2-glycoprotein I.  Thromb Haemost. 1999;  81 929-934
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tripodi A, Biasiolo A, Chantarangkul V, Pengo V. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing: performance of clinical laboratories assessed by a national survey using lyophilized affinity-purified immunoglobulin with LA activity.  Clin Chem. 2003;  49 1608-1614
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Pengo V, Biasiolo A, Gresele P et al.. on behalf of participating centers of Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA). Survey on lupus anticoagulant diagnosis by central evaluation of positive plasma samples.  J Thromb Haemost. 2007;  5 925-930
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kelsey P R, Stevenson K J, Poller L. The diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants by the activated partial thromboplastin time; the central role of phosphatidyl serine.  Thromb Haemost. 1984;  52 172-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Exner T, Rickard K A, Kronenberg H. A sensitive test demonstrating lupus anticoagulant and its behavioural patterns.  Br J Haematol. 1978;  40 143-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Denis-Magdelaine A, Flahault A, Verdy E. Sensitivity of sixteen APTT reagents for the presence of lupus anticoagulants.  Haemostasis. 1995;  25 98-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Adcock D M, Marlar R A. Activated partial thromboplastin time reagent sensitivity to the presence of the lupus anticoagulant.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;  116 837-840
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Brancaccio V, Ames P R, Glynn J, Iannaccone L, Mackie I J. A rapid screen for lupus anticoagulant with good discrimination from oral anticoagulants, congenital factor deficiency and heparin, is provided by comparing a sensitive and an insensitive APTT reagent.  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1997;  8 155-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rauch J, Tannenbaum M, Janoff A S. Distinguishing plasma lupus anticoagulants from anti-factor antibodies using hexagonal (II) phase phospholipids.  Thromb Haemost. 1989;  62 892-896
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Triplett D A, Barna L K, Unger G A. A hexagonal (II) phase phospholipid neutralization assay for lupus anticoagulant identification.  Thromb Haemost. 1993;  70 787-793
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Brandt J T, Barna L K, Triplett D A. Laboratory identification of lupus anticoagulants: results of the Second International Workshop for Identification of Lupus Anticoagulants. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulants/Antiphospholipid Antibodies of the ISTH.  Thromb Haemost. 1995;  74 1597-1603
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tripodi A, Mancuso M E, Chantarangkul V et al.. Lupus anticoagulants and their relationship with the inhibitors against coagulation factor VIII: considerations on the differentiation between the 2 circulating anticoagulants.  Clin Chem. 2005;  51 1883-1885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chantarangkul V, Tripodi A, Arbini A, Mannucci P M. Silica clotting time (SCT) as a screening and confirmatory test for detection of the lupus anticoagulants.  Thromb Res. 1992;  67 355-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Arnout J, Vanrusselt M, Huybrechts E, Vermylen J. Optimization of the dilute prothrombin time for the detection of the lupus anticoagulant by use of a recombinant tissue thromboplastin.  Br J Haematol. 1994;  87 94-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Thiagarajan P, Pengo V, Shapiro S S. The use of the dilute Russell viper venom time for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants.  Blood. 1986;  68 869-874
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Galli M, Finazzi G, Bevers E M, Barbui T. Kaolin clotting time and dilute Russell viper venom time distinguish between prothrombin-dependent and beta 2-glycoprotein I-dependent antiphospholipid antibodies.  Blood. 1995;  86 617-623
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pengo V, Biasiolo A, Rampazzo P, Brocco T. dRVVT is more sensitive than KCT or TTI for detecting lupus anticoagulant activity of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I autoantibodies.  Thromb Haemost. 1999;  81 256-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Moore G W, Savidge G F. Heterogeneity of Russell viper venom affects the sensitivity of the dilute Russell viper venom time to lupus anticoagulants.  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2004;  15 279-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gardiner C, MacKie I J, Malia R G et al.. The importance of locally derived reference ranges and standardized calculation of dilute Russell viper venom time results in screening for lupus anticoagulant.  Br J Haematol. 2000;  111 1230-1235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jacobsen E M, Barna-Cler L, Taylor J M, Triplett D A, Wisloff F. The lupus ratio test; an interlaboratory study on the detection of lupus anticoagulants by an APTT-based, integrated, and semi-quantitative test. Fifth International Survey of Lupus Anticoagulants ISLA 5.  Thromb Haemost. 2000;  83 704-708
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rosner E, Pauzner R, Lusky A, Modan M, Many A. Detection and quantitative evaluation of lupus circulating anticoagulant activity.  Thromb Haemost. 1987;  57 144-147
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tripodi A, Chantarangkul V, Clerici M, Mannucci P M. Laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants for patients on oral anticoagulant treatment. Performance of dilute Russell viper venom test and silica clotting time in comparison with Staclot LA.  Thromb Haemost. 2002;  88 583-586
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Triplett D A, Brandt J T, Kaczor D, Schaeffer J. Laboratory diagnosis of lupus inhibitors: a comparison of the tissue thromboplastin inhibition procedure with a new platelet neutralization procedure.  Am J Clin Pathol. 1983;  79 678-682
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Feinstein D I. Acquired disorders of hemostasis. In: Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Salzman EW Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Basic Principles and Clinical Practice. Third ed. Philadelphia, PA; Lippincott 1994: 881-905
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L, Bussey H, Jacobson A, Hylek E. The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.  , [Erratum in: Chest 2005;127:415–416] Chest. 2004;  126(3, Suppl) 204S-233S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Triplett D A, Stocker K F, Unger G A, Barna L K. The textarin/ecarin ratio: a confirmatory test for lupus anticoagulants.  Thromb Haemost. 1993;  70 925-931
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Chantarangkul V, Tripodi A, Clerici M, Bressi C, Mannucci P M. Laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants; effect of residual platelets in plasma, assessed by Staclot LA and silica clotting time.  Thromb Haemost. 2002;  87 854-858
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sletnes K E, Gravem K, Wisloff F. Preparation of plasma for the detection of lupus anticoagulants and antiphospholipid antibodies.  Thromb Res. 1992;  66 43-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Exner T. Conceptions and misconceptions in testing for lupus anticoagulants.  J Autoimmun. 2000;  15 179-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Favaloro E J. Preanalytical variables in coagulation testing.  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2007;  18 86-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Galli M, Luciani D, Bertolini G, Barbui T. Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.  Blood. 2003;  101 1827-1832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Rai R S, Regan L, Clifford K et al.. Antiphospholipid antibodies and beta2-glycoprotein I in 500 women with recurrent miscarriage: results of a comprehensive screening approach.  Hum Reprod. 1995;  10 2001-2005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 de Laat B, Wu X X, van Lummel M, Derksen R H, de Groot P G, Rand J H. Correlation between antiphospholipid antibodies that recognize domain I of beta2-glycoprotein I and a reduction in the anticoagulant activity of annexin A5.  Blood. 2007;  109 1490-1494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Armando Tripodi

Via Pace 9, 20122 Milan

Italy

Email: armando.tripodi@unimi.it

      >