Int J Sports Med
DOI: 10.1055/a-2330-3001
Training & Testing

Hexagonal barbell deadlift one-repetition maximum estimation using velocity recordings

1   Faculty of sport and physical education, University of Belgrade, Malaga, Serbia (Ringgold ID: RIN54801)
,
Deniz Senturk
2   School of physical education of sports department, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey (Ringgold ID: RIN270726)
,
Zeki Akyildiz
3   Department of Coaching Education, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey (Ringgold ID: RIN53002)
,
Yaodong Gu
4   Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China (Ringgold ID: RIN47862)
,
5   Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Granada, Granada, Spain (Ringgold ID: RIN16741)
› Author Affiliations
Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 12250410237

This study aimed to determine whether the optimal minimal velocity threshold (MVT) provides more precise estimates of one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) than the general and individual MVTs. The 1RM of 27 resistance-trained males were predicted using three types of MVT: (i) General MVT: averaged across subjects’ velocity of the 1RM trial (0.25 m·s-1), (ii) individual MVT: velocity attained during the 1RM trial, and (iii) Optimal MVT: MVT that eliminated the differences between the actual and predicted 1RM. Two individual load-velocity relationships were modelled considering five (30-50-70-80%1RM) or six (30-50-70-80-90%1RM) loading conditions. Negligible differences (Effect size < 0.20), low absolute errors (< 5% of the actual 1RM), and extremely high correlations (r > 0.90) were observed between the actual and six predicted 1RMs. The only significant difference was the lower raw errors for the 90%1RM condition (0.60 ± 7.34 kg) compared to the 80%1RM condition (2.27 ± 7.54 kg; p = 0.013). These results suggest that the individual load-velocity relationship offers an accurate estimation of the HBD 1RM in resistance-trained males, and these estimates could maintain similar levels of precision across different types of MVT (general, individual, and optimal) and final tested loads (80%1RM and 90%1RM).



Publication History

Received: 23 April 2024

Accepted after revision: 20 May 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
20 May 2024

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany